Title 11  ENVIRONMENT
Chapters:
11.10  State Environmental Policy Act
11.16  Aquifer Fees
11.17  Spokane--Rathdrum Aquifer Protection Area
11.20  Critical Areas

Chapter 11.10  STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
Sections:
ARTICLE I.  AUTHORITY
11.10.010  Authority.
ARTICLE II.  GENERAL REQUIREMENTS
11.10.020  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
11.10.040  Designation of responsible official.
11.10.050  Lead agency determination and agency responsibilities.
11.10.055  Other timing and additional considerations applicable to the SEPA process.
ARTICLE III.  CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS AND THRESHOLD DETERMINATIONS
11.10.065  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
11.10.070  Flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions.
11.10.075  Categorical exemptions--Applicability.
11.10.080  Use of exemptions.
11.10.090  Environmental checklist.1  ;noanchor;

__________
1  Editor's Note: The Environmental checklist is on file in the Spokane County Building and Planning Department.

__________
11.10.100  Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS).
ARTICLE IV.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS)
11.10.110  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
11.10.120  Preparation of EIS--Additional consideration.
11.10.122  Additional elements to be covered in an EIS.
ARTICLE V.  COMMENTING
11.10.128  Adoption by reference.
11.10.130  Public notice.
11.10.140  Designation of official to perform consulted agency responsibilities for Spokane County.2  ;noanchor;

__________
2  Each jurisdiction adopting this ordinance (City of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane Regional Health District, and Spokane County Control Authority  ) will insert the appropriate reference. 

__________
ARTICLE VI.  USING EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS
11.10.150  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
ARTICLE VII.  SEPA AND AGENCY DECISIONS
11.10.155  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
11.10.160  Substantive authority.
11.10.170  Appeals.
ARTICLE VIII.  DEFINITIONS
11.10.175  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
11.10.177  Additional definitions.
ARTICLE IX.  CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS
11.10.180  Adoption by reference.
11.10.182  Certification of emergencies.
ARTICLE X.  AGENCY COMPLIANCE
11.10.185  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
11.10.190  Critical areas.
11.10.200  Fees.
11.10.210  Amending the ordinance codified in this chapter.
11.10.215  SEPA public information.
11.10.220  Severability.
ARTICLE XI.  FORMS
11.10.230  Adoption by reference.
Appendixes
Appendix A  SEPA Policies.
Appendix B  SEPA exemption levels matrix.
Appendix C  Additional environmental forms.
Appendix D  Summary of SEPA process/SEPA public involvement requirements.
Appendix E  SEPA fees schedule.

ARTICLE I.  AUTHORITY

11.10.010  Authority.
Spokane County  adopts the ordinance codified in this chapter under the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), RCW 43.21C.120, and the SEPA rules, WAC 197-11-904. 
The ordinance codified in this chapter containsSpokane County's  SEPA procedures and policies. 
The intent of the ordinance codified in this chapter is to establish uniform environmental review requirements between the city of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane Regional Health District, and Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority while allowing each jurisdiction to maintain flexible review procedures as specified in the ordinance.
The SEPA rules, WAC Chapter 197-11, must be used in conjunction with the ordinance codified in this chapter.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

ARTICLE II.  GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

11.10.020  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
This article contains the basic requirements that apply to the SEPA process.Spokane County  adopts the following sections of chapter 197-11 of the Washington Administrative Code by reference: 
TABLE INSET:

    WAC        
197-11-040   Definitions.   
197-11-050   Lead agency.   
197-11-055   Timing of the SEPA process.   
197-11-060   Content of environmental review.   
197-11-070   Limitations on actions during SEPA process.   
197-11-080   Incomplete or unavailable information.   
197-11-090   Supporting documents.   
197-11-100   Information required of applicants.   
197-11-158   GMA project review--Reliance on existing plans, laws, and regulations.   
197-11-210   SEPA/GMA integration.   
197-11-220   SEPA/GMA definitions.   
197-11-228   Overall SEPA/GMA integration procedures.   
197-11-230   Timing of an integrated GMA/SEPA process.   
197-11-232   SEPA/GMA integration procedures for preliminary planning, environmental analysis, and expanded scoping.   
197-11-235   Documents.   
197-11-238   Monitoring.   
197-11-250   SEPA/MODEL toxics control act integration.   
197-11-253   SEPA lead agency for MTCA actions.   
197-11-256   Preliminary evaluation.   
197-11-259   Determination of nonsignificance for MTCA remedial actions.   
197-11-262   Determination of significance and EIS for MTCA remedial actions.   
197-11-265   Early scoping for MTCA remedial actions.   
197-11-268   MTCA interim actions.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.040  Designation of responsible official.
(a)   For public proposals, the head (administrative official) of the department making the proposal shall be the responsible official. For private proposals, the head (administrative official) of the department with primary responsibility for approving the permits and licenses for the proposal shall be the responsible official. When multiple officials have permitting authority, the assignment of responsibility shall be reached by agreement.
(b)   For all proposals for whichSpokane County  is the lead agency, the responsible official shall make the threshold determination, supervise scoping and preparation of any required environmental impact statement (EIS), and perform any other functions assigned to the "lead agency" or "responsible official" by those sections of the SEPA rules that were adopted by reference in Section 11.10.020. 
(c)   Spokane County  shall retain all documents required by the SEPA rules (WAC Chapter 197-11) and make them available in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17. 
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.050  Lead agency determination and agency responsibilities.
(a)   The department withinSpokane County  receiving an application for or initiating a proposal that involves a nonexempt action shall determine the lead agency for that proposal under WAC 197-11-050, 197-11-253, and 197-11-922 through 197-11-940; unless the lead agency has been previously determined or the department is aware that another department or agency is in the process of determining the lead agency. 
(b)   WhenSpokane County  is the lead agency for a proposal, the department receiving the application shall determine the responsible official who shall supervise compliance with the threshold determination requirements, and if an EIS is necessary, shall supervise preparation of the EIS. 
(c)   WhenSpokane County  is not the lead agency for a proposal, all departments of  Spokane County  shall use and consider, as appropriate, either the DNS or the final EIS of the lead agency in making decisions on the proposal. No  Spokane County  department shall prepare or require preparation of a DNS or EIS in addition to that prepared by the lead agency unless required under WAC 197-11-600. In some cases,  Spokane County  may conduct supplemental environmental review under WAC 197-11-600. 
(d)   IfSpokane County  or any of its departments receives a lead agency determination made by another agency that appears inconsistent with the criteria of WAC 197-11-253, or WAC 197-11-922 through 197-11-940, it may object to the determination. Any objection must be made to the agency originally making the determination and resolved within fifteen days of receipt of the determination or  Spokane County  must petition the Department of Ecology for a lead agency determination under WAC 197-11-946 within the fifteen-day time period. Any such petition on behalf of   Spokane County  may be initiated by the potential responsible official. 
(e)   Departments ofSpokane County  are authorized to make agreements as to lead agency status or shared lead agency duties for a proposal under WAC 197-11-942 and 197-11-944, provided that the responsible official and any department that will incur responsibilities as the result of such agreement approve the agreement. 
(f)   Any department making a lead agency determination for a private project shall require sufficient information from the applicant to identify which other agencies have jurisdiction over the proposal (that is, which agencies require nonexempt licenses).
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.055  Other timing and additional considerations applicable to the SEPA process.
(a)   The following time limits shall apply when there is no established agency procedure.
Threshold determinations.
(1)   When the responsible official requires further information from the applicant or consultation with other agencies with jurisdiction:
(A)   The responsible official should request such further information within seven days of receiving an adequate application and completed environmental checklist;
(B)   The responsible official shall wait no longer than fourteen days for a consulted agency to respond;
(C)   The responsible official should complete the threshold determination within seven days of receiving the requested information from the applicant or the consulted agency.
(2)   When the responsible official must initiate further studies, including field investigations, to obtain the information to make the threshold determination, the responsible official should complete the studies within thirty days of receiving an adequate application and a completed checklist.
(3)   The responsible official shall complete threshold determinations on actions where the applicant recommends in writing that an EIS be prepared within seven days.
(b)   For nonexempt proposals, the DNS or Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the proposal shall accompany the department's staff recommendation to any advisory or final-action body.
(c)   If the only action is a decision on a building permit or other license that requires detailed project plans and specifications,Spokane County  shall provide the applicant with the opportunity for environmental review under SEPA before requiring the applicant to submit such detailed project plans and specifications. 
(1)   Spokane County  may specify the amount of detail needed from the applicant for such early environmental review, consistent with WAC 197-11-100 and 197-11-335. 
(2)   This subsection does not preclude an applicant from preliminary discussions or exploration of ideas and options prior to commencing formal environmental review.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part) 1984)

ARTICLE III.  CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS AND THRESHOLD DETERMINATIONS

11.10.065  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
This article contains the rules for deciding whether a proposal has a "probable significant adverse environmental impact" requiring an environmental impact statement (EIS) to be prepared. This article also contains rules for evaluating the impacts of proposals not requiring an EIS.Spokane County  adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented in this article. 
TABLE INSET:

    WAC        
197-11-300   Purpose of this article.   
197-11-305   Categorical exemptions.   
197-11-310   Threshold determination required.   
197-11-315   Environmental checklist.   
197-11-330   Threshold determination process.   
197-11-335   Additional information.   
197-11-340   Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).   
197-11-350   Mitigated DNS.   
197-11-355   Optional DNS process.   
197-11-360   Determination of significance (DS)/initiation of scoping.   
197-11-390   Effect of threshold determination.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.070  Flexible thresholds for categorical exemptions.
In addition to those exemptions identified in part nine (Categorical Exemptions) of the ordinance codified in this chapter,Spokane County  establishes the following exempt levels for minor new construction under WAC 197-11-800(1)(c), based on local conditions. 
(a)   For residential dwelling units in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(i): up to twenty dwelling units.
(b)   For agricultural structures in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(ii): up to twenty thousand square feet.
(c)   For office, school, commercial, recreational, service or storage buildings in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(iii): up to twelve thousand square feet and up to forty parking spaces.
(d)   For parking lots in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(iv): up to forty parking spaces.
(e)   For landfills and excavations in WAC 197-11-800(1)(b)(v): up to five hundred cubic yards.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.075  Categorical exemptions--Applicability.
(a)   If a proposal fits within any of the provisions in Sections 11.10.180 and 11.10.070, the proposal shall be categorically exempt from the threshold determination requirements (WAC 197-11-720), except when the proposal is a segment of a proposal that includes:
(1)   a series of actions, physically or functionally related to each other, some of which are categorically exempt and some of which are not; or
(2)   a series of exempt actions that are physically or functionally related to each other, and that together may have a probable significant adverse environmental impact in the judgment of an agency with jurisdiction. If so, that agency shall be the lead agency unless the agencies with jurisdiction agree that another agency should be the lead agency. Agencies may petition the department of ecology to resolve disputes (WAC 197-11-946).
For such proposals, the agency or applicant may proceed with the exempt aspects of the proposals, prior to conducting environmental review, provided the requirements of WAC 197-11-070 are met. See Appendix B for an informational matrix of exempt and nonexempt activities.
(b)   The lead agency is not required to document that a proposal is categorically exempt. The lead agency may note on an application that a proposal is categorically exempt or place such a determination in the agency's files.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.080  Use of exemptions.
(a)   Each department withinSpokane County  that receives an application for a license or, in the case of governmental proposals, the department initiating the proposal, shall determine whether the license and/or the proposal is exempt. The department's determination that a proposal is exempt shall be final and not subject to administrative review. If a proposal is exempt, none of the procedural requirements of the ordinance codified in this chapter applies to the proposal.  Spokane County  shall not require completion of an environmental checklist for an exempt proposal. 
(b)   In determining whether a proposal is exempt, the department shall make certain the proposal is properly defined and shall identify the governmental licenses required (WAC 197-11-060). If a proposal includes exempt and nonexempt actions, the department shall determine the lead agency, even if the license application that triggers the department's consideration is exempt.
(c)   If a proposal includes both exempt and nonexempt actions,Spokane County  may authorize exempt actions prior to compliance with the procedural requirements of the ordinance codified in this chapter, except that: 
(1)   Spokane County  shall not authorize: 
(A)   any nonexempt action;
(B)   any action that would limit the choice of alternatives for environmental review;
(C)   any action that would have a probable significant adverse environmental impact.
(2)   A responsible official may withhold approval of an exempt action that would modify the environment, when such modification would result in a probable significant adverse impact or would limit the choice of alternatives for environmental review.
(3)   A responsible official may withhold approval of an exempt action that would lead to an applicant making substantial financial expenditures when there is some doubt that the entire proposal (i.e., subdivision) may not be approved.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.090  Environmental checklist.
(a)   A completed environmental checklist* shall be filed prior to or at the same time as an application for a permit, license, certificate, or other approval not exempted in the ordinance codified in this chapter; except a checklist is not needed ifSpokane County  and the applicant agree an EIS is required, SEPA compliance has been completed, or SEPA compliance has been initiated by another agency. The checklist shall be in the form provided for in Section 11.10.230(a), which is based on the form in WAC 197-11-960 with the following questions added or modified: 
(1)   Question (1)(A)(7)(b), providing identification of other land owned or optioned by the proponent in the vicinity of the proposal;
(2)   Question (1)(A)(13), dealing with the aquifer sensitive area and the priority sewer service area;
(3)   Question (1)(C), providing a full disclosure oath in the signature block;
(4)   Question (1)(B)(8)(h), classified as "critical area;"
(5)   Question (1)(A)(14)(a)(1) through (3), dealing with project impact to the critical aquifer recharge area/aquifer sensitive area;
(6)   Question (1)(A)(14)(a)(4), dealing with use and handling of chemicals;
(7)   Question (1)(A)(14)(b)(1) through (2), including water runoff or storm water to be discharged and when known to describe the depths to groundwater and to bedrock;
(8)   Question (1)(B)(14)(f) adding a footnote for how many vehicular trips during PM Peak, AM Peak, and Weekday (twenty-four hours) would be generated, if known, by the completed project.
(b)   For private proposals,Spokane County  will require the applicant to complete the environmental checklist. For public proposals, the department initiating the proposal shall complete the environmental checklist for that proposal. 
(c)   Spokane County  may require that it, and not the private applicant, will complete all, or part of, the environmental checklist for a private proposal if the applicant has provided inaccurate information on previous proposals or on proposals currently under consideration, or if  Spokane County  has technical information on a question or questions that is unavailable to the private applicant. The applicant shall reimburse  Spokane County  for time and effort so expended. 
(d)   During the review of the environmental checklist, the staff ofSpokane County  may make such changes or additions to the environmental checklist as are necessary to make it an accurate statement. Alternatively, the staff may return the checklist to the applicant for revisions and/or additional information. 
(e)   For projects submitted under an approved planned action under WAC 197-11-168,Spokane County  shall use its existing environmental checklist form or may modify the environmental checklist form as provided in WAC 197-11-315. The modified environmental checklist form may be prepared and adopted along with, or as part of, a planned action ordinance, or developed after the ordinance is adopted. In either case, a proposed modified environmental checklist form must be sent to the Department of Ecology to allow at least a thirty days review prior to use. 
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)
* Editor's Note: The Environmental checklist is on file in the Spokane County Building and Planning Department.

11.10.100  Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (DNS).
(a)   As provided in this section and in WAC 197-11-350, the responsible official may issue a DNS based on conditions attached to the proposal by the responsible official or on changes to or clarification of, the proposal made by the applicant.
(b)   An applicant may request in writing early notice of whether a DS is likely under WAC 197-11-350. The request must:
(1)   follow submission of a complete permit application and environmental checklist for a nonexempt proposal for which the department is lead agency; and
(2)   precede the agency's actual threshold determination for the proposal.
(c)   The responsible official or a designee shall respond in writing to the request for early notice within fourteen days unless otherwise agreed to. The response shall:
(1)   be written; and
(2)   state whetherSpokane County  currently considers issuance of a DS likely, and if so, indicate the general or specific area(s) of concern leading  Spokane County  to consider a DS; and 
(3)   state that the applicant may change or clarify the proposal to mitigate the indicated impacts, revising the environmental checklist and/or permit application as necessary to reflect the changes or clarifications.
(d)   As much as possible, the lead agency should assist the applicant with identification of impacts to the extent necessary to formulate mitigation measures.
(e)   When an applicant submits a changed or clarified proposal, along with a revised or amended environmental checklist, the responsible official shall base the threshold determination on the changed or clarified proposal and should make the determination within fourteen days of receiving the changed or clarified proposal unless otherwise established by agency procedures.
(1)   If the responsible official indicated specific mitigation measures in the response to the request for early notice and the applicant changed or clarified the proposal to include those specific mitigation measures, the responsible official shall issue and circulate a DNS pursuant to WAC 197-11-340(2).
(2)   If the responsible official indicated areas of concern but did not indicate specific mitigation measures that would allow the issuance of a DNS, the responsible official shall make the threshold determination, issuing a DNS or DS as appropriate.
(3)   The applicant's proposed mitigation measures (clarifications, changes or conditions) must be in writing and must be specific. For example, proposals to "control noise" or "prevent stormwater runoff" are inadequate, whereas proposals to "muffle machinery to X-decibel" or "construct 200-foot stormwater retention pond at Y-location" are adequate.
(4)   Mitigation measures which justify issuance of a mitigated DNS may be incorporated in the DNS by reference to agency staff reports, studies or other documents.
(f)   A mitigated DNS is issued either under WAC 197-11-340(2) requiring a fourteen day comment period unless otherwise established by agency procedure and public notice pursuant to Section 11.10.130, or under WAC 197-11-355, which may require no additional comment period beyond the comment period on the notice of application.
(g)   Mitigation measures incorporated in the mitigated DNS shall be deemed conditions of approval of the permit decision and may be enforced in the same manner as any term or condition of the permit or enforced in any manner specifically prescribed bySpokane County  . 
(h)   IfSpokane County's  tentative decision on a permit or approval does not include mitigation measures that were incorporated in a mitigated DNS for the proposal,  Spokane County  should evaluate the threshold determination to assure consistency with WAC 197-11-340(3)(a) (withdrawal of DNS). 
(i)   Spokane County's  written response under subsections (b) and (c) of this section shall not be construed as a determination of significance. In addition, preliminary discussion of clarifications or changes to a proposal, as opposed to a written request for early notice, shall not bind  Spokane County  to consider the clarifications or changes in its threshold determination. 
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

ARTICLE IV.  ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS)

11.10.110  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
This article contains the rules for preparing environmental impact statements.Spokane County  adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented by this article. 
TABLE INSET:

    WAC        
197-11-400   Purpose of EIS.   
197-11-402   General requirements.   
197-11-405   EIS timing.   
197-11-408   Scoping.   
197-11-410   Expanding scoping.   
197-11-420   EIS preparation.   
197-11-425   Style and size.   
197-11-430   Format.   
197-11-435   Cover letter or memo.   
197-11-440   EIS contents.   
197-11-442   Contents of EIS on nonproject proposals.   
197-11-443   EIS contents when prior nonproject EIS.   
197-11-444   Elements of the environment.   
197-11-448   Relationship of EIS to other considerations.   
197-11-450   Cost/benefit analysis.   
197-11-455   Issuance of DEIS.   
197-11-460   Issuance of FEIS.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.120  Preparation of EIS--Additional consideration.
(a)   Preparation of the draft and final EIS (DEIS and FEIS) and a draft and final Supplemental EIS (SEIS) is the responsibility of the lead agency under the direction of the responsible official. No matter who participates in the preparation of the EIS, it is the EIS ofSpokane County  . The responsible official shall be satisfied that the EIS complies with the provisions of the ordinance codified in this chapter and WAC Chapter 197-11 before issuing the EIS. 
(b)   The DEIS and FESIS or draft and final SEIS shall be prepared bySpokane County  staff, the applicant or its agent, or by an outside consultant retained by either an applicant or the lead agency. 
(1)   For public projects, the responsible official shall determine when an outside consultant should prepare the EIS based on available staff, expertise, resources and public interest to adequately assess and evaluate the impacts of the projects.
(2)   For projects initiated by a private applicant, the preparation of an EIS shall be under the direction of the responsible official. The responsible official shall notify the applicant of the procedures for an EIS preparation, including approval of the DEIS, FEIS and SEIS prior to distribution. All costs of preparing the EIS shall be borne by the applicant.
(c)   If a person other than the lead agency is preparing the EIS, the responsible official shall:
(1)   Assure that the EIS is prepared in a responsible manner and with appropriate methodology;
(2)   Be responsible for scoping and preparation of a scoping report pursuant to WAC 197-11-408 (the responsible official may include consultants in the scoping process);
(3)   Coordinate any areas of research and examination to be undertaken, as well as the organization of the resulting document;
(4)   Meet with the persons preparing the EIS and review draft sections of the EIS to assure the completeness, accuracy, and objectivity, of the EIS;
(5)   Allow any person preparing an EIS access to all relevant public records of the lead agency, pursuant to RCW Chapter 42.17 (Public Disclosure and Public Records Law);
(6)   Assist in obtaining any information on file with another agency that is needed by the person preparing the EIS.
(d)   The lead agency may require an applicant to provide information the lead agency does not possess, including specific investigations. However, the applicant is not required to supply information that is not required under the ordinance codified in this chapter or that is being requested from another agency. (This does not apply to information the lead agency may request under another ordinance or statute.)
(e)   Any person, firm, or corporation assisting in the preparation of an EIS for private projects shall have expertise and experience in preparing environmental impact statements and shall be approved in writing by the responsible official before participating in the EIS process. The lead agency may create and maintain an EIS list of Qualified Consultants to assist in determining the expertise and experience of consultants using, but not limited to, the following procedures.
(1)   Annually or biannually placing a legal notice in the County's official newspaper requesting statement of qualifications (SOQ). Interested consultants will be required to submit an application package for consideration to be placed on the list.
(2)   Spokane County  will review the SOQs and place those consultant firms who are determined to meet the minimum qualifications on the list. Those qualifications include, but are not limited to: 
(A)   Possessing a thorough and comprehensive knowledge of the procedural and substantive requirements of SEPA and related regulations;
(B)   Possessing adequate technical and administrative capacity to produce EIS documents and/or associated technical documents;
(f)   The private applicant shall compensate the lead agency for its administrative costs incurred with the development, production, and processing of the EIS, in accordance with Section 11.10.200.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.120  Additional elements to be covered in an EIS.
(a)   The table of contents shall include the list of elements of the environment (WAC 197-11-444), indicating those elements or portions of elements that do not involve significant adverse impacts (reference WAC 197-11-440[3][b]).
(b)   The lead agency may include, at its discretion, in an EIS or its appendix, the analysis of any impact relevant to the agency's decision, whether or not the impact is an environmental one. The inclusion of such analysis may or may not be based upon comments received during the scoping process. The provision for combining documents may be used (WAC 197-11-640). The EIS shall comply with the format requirements of WAC 197-11-400 through 197-11-500. The decision whether to include such information and the adequacy of any such additional analysis shall not be used in determining whether an EIS meets the requirements of SEPA.
(c)   If the lead agency chooses to include a cost/benefit analysis in an EIS, such analysis shall be consistent with WAC 197-11-450.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

ARTICLE V.  COMMENTING

11.10.128  Adoption by reference.
This article contains rules for consulting, commenting, and responding on all environmental documents under SEPA, including rules for public notice and hearings.Spokane County  adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented in this article. 
TABLE INSET:

    WAC        
197-11-500   Purpose of this article.   
197-11-502   Inviting comment.   
197-11-504   Availability and cost of environmental documents.   
197-11-508   SEPA register.   
197-11-510   Public notice.   
197-11-535   Public hearings and meetings.   
197-11-545   Effect of no comment.   
197-11-550   Specificity of comments.   
197-11-560   FEIS response to comments.   
197-11-570   Consulted agency costs to assist lead agency.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.130  Public notice.
(a)   Whenever possible, the lead agency shall integrate the public notice requirement of this section with existing notice procedures for the lead agency's nonexempt permit(s) or approval(s) required for the proposal.
(b)   Whenever the Spokane Regional health district or the Spokane County air pollution control authority issues a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2) or a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3), public notice shall be given by publishing notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county, city, or general area where the proposal is located.
(c)   Whenever the city of Spokane or Spokane County issues a DNS under WAC 197-11-340(2) or a DS under WAC 197-11-360(3), the lead agency shall give public notice as follows.
(1)   If public notice is required for a nonexempt license by other regulations, that notice shall state whether a DS or DNS has been issued and when comments are due.
(2)   If an environmental document is issued concurrently with the Notice of Application, the public notice requirements as set forth in Title 13 of the Spokane County Code* will suffice to meet the public notice requirements in WAC 197-11-510(1).3 

__________
3  The City of Spokane will insert the appropriate regulation.

__________
(3)   If no public notice is otherwise required for the permit or approval, the lead agency shall give notice of the DNS or DS as provided for in WAC 197-11-510 and locally adopted rules and regulations.
(4)   If a DS is issued under WAC 197-11-360(3), the lead agency shall state the scoping procedure for the proposal in the DS, as required pursuant to WAC 197-11-408.
(d)   If a DNS is issued using the Optional DNS process, the public notice requirements for a notice of application as set forth in Title 13 of the Spokane County Code,4  as supplemented by the requirements in WAC 197-11-355, will suffice to meet the public notice requirements in WAC 197-11-510(1)(b).

__________
4  The City of Spokane will insert the appropriate regulation.

__________
(e)   Whenever the lead agency issues a DEIS under WAC 197-11-455(5) or an SEIS under WAC 197-11-620, notice of the availability of these documents shall be given by the following:
(1)   Indicating the availability of the DEIS in any public notice required for the nonexempt license subsequently published after the issuance of the DEIS and prior to the first public hearing regarding a nonexempt license.
(2)   Selecting one or more of the following notification methods.
(A)   Posting the property for site specific proposals pursuant to the administrative procedures for the underlying action.
(B)   Publishing a legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation in the county, city or general area where the proposal is located.
(C)   Notifying of public or private groups, which have expressed an interest in a certain proposal, or in the type of proposal being considered.
(D)   Notifying the news media.
(E)   Placing notices in appropriate regional, neighborhood, ethnic, or trade journals.
(F)   Publishing notice inSpokane County  newsletters and/or sending notice to agency mailing lists (either general lists or lists for specific proposals for subject areas). 
(f)   The lead agency may require an applicant to complete the public notice requirements for the proposal at his or her expense or otherwise may charge a fee sufficient to cover the lead agency's entire cost of meeting the public notice requirements.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.140  Designation of official to perform consulted agency responsibilities for Spokane County.
(a)   The director of the department with appropriate expertise shall be responsible for preparation of written comments for an agency in response to a consultation request prior to a threshold determination, participation in scoping, and reviewing DEIS.
(b)   The director shall be responsible forSpokane County's  compliance with WAC 197-11-550 whenever such department is a consulted agency and is authorized to develop operating procedures that will ensure that responses to consultation requests are prepared in a timely fashion and include data from all appropriate departments of  County.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

ARTICLE VI.  USING EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTS

11.10.150  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
This article contains rules for using and supplementing existing environmental documents prepared under SEPA or the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for an agency's own environmental compliance.Spokane County  adopts the following sections by reference. 
TABLE INSET:

    WAC        
197-11-164   Planned actions--Definition and criteria.   
197-11-168   Ordinances or resolutions designating planned actions--Procedures for adoption.   
197-11-172   Planned actions--Project review.   
197-11-600   When to use existing environmental documents.   
197-11-610   Use of NEPA documents.   
197-11-620   Supplemental environmental impact statement--Procedures.   
197-11-625   Addenda--Procedures.   
197-11-630   Adoption--Procedures.   
197-11-635   Incorporation by reference--Procedures.   
197-11-640   Combining documents.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

ARTICLE VII.  SEPA AND AGENCY DECISIONS

11.10.155  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
This article contains rules (and policies) for SEPA's substantive authority, such as decisions to mitigate or reject proposals as a result of SEPA. This article also contains procedures for appealing SEPA determinations to agencies or the courts.Spokane County  adopts the following sections by reference. 
TABLE INSET:

    WAC        
197-11-650   Purpose of this article.   
197-11-655   Implementation.   
197-11-660   Substantive authority and mitigation.   
197-11-680   Appeals.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.160  Substantive authority.
(a)   The policies and goals set forth in the ordinance codified in this chapter are supplementary to those in the existing authorization of the city of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane regional health district and Spokane County air pollution control authority.
(b)   Spokane County  may attach conditions to a permit or approval for a proposal so long as: 
(1)   such conditions are necessary to mitigate specific probable adverse environmental impacts identified in environmental documents prepared with regard to the license and pursuant to the ordinance codified in this chapter;
(2)   such conditions are in writing;
(3)   the mitigation measures included in such conditions are reasonable and capable of being accomplished;
(4)   Spokane County  has considered whether other local, state or federal mitigation measures applied to the proposal are sufficient to mitigate the identified impacts; and 
(5)   such conditions are based on one or more policies in subsection (d) of this section and cited in the license or other decision document.
(c)   Spokane County  may deny a permit or approval for a proposal on the basis of SEPA provided that: 
(1)   a finding is made that approving the proposal would result in probable significant adverse environmental impacts that are identified in a FEIS or final SEIS prepared pursuant to the ordinance codified in this chapter; and
(2)   a finding is made that there are no reasonable mitigation measures capable of being accomplished that are sufficient to mitigate the identified impact; and
(3)   the denial is based on one or more policies identified in subsection (d) of this section and identified in writing in the decision document.
(d)   Spokane County  adopts the following policies as the basis for the exercise of substantive authority, pursuant to this section. 
(1)   Spokane County  shall use all practicable means consistent with other essential considerations of state policy to improve and coordinate plans, functions, programs and resources to the end that the State and its citizens may: 
(A)   fulfill the responsibilities of each generation as trustee of the environment for succeeding generations;
(B)   assure for all people of Washington safe, healthful, productive and aesthetically and culturally pleasing surroundings;
(C)   attain the widest range of beneficial uses of the environment without degradation, risk to health or safety, or other undesirable and unintended consequences;
(D)   preserve important historic, cultural and natural aspects of our national heritage;
(E)   maintain, wherever possible, an environment which supports diversity and variety of individual choice;
(F)   achieve a balance between population and resource use which will permit high standards of living and a wide sharing of life's amenities; and
(G)   enhance the quality of renewable resources and approach the maximum attainable recycling of depletable resources.
(2)   Spokane County  recognizes that each person has a fundamental and inalienable right to a healthful environment and that each person has a responsibility to contribute to the preservation and enhancement of the environment. 
(3)   Spokane County  , for the purposes of RCW 43.21C.060 and WAC 197-11-660(a), adopts by reference the policies, plans, rules, and regulations, and all amendments thereto, identified in Appendix A. Appendix A is adopted and may be amended by Spokane County pursuant to WAC 197-11-902 and is exempt from Section 11.10.200 (amending the ordinance codified in this chapter). 
(e)   Except for permits and variances issued pursuant to RCW Chapter 90.58 (the Washington State Shorelines Management Act) and rules promulgated thereto, appeals of decisions or actions conditioned or denied on the basis of SEPA by a non elected official shall be appealable in accordance with Section 11.10.170.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.170  Appeals.
(a)   Spokane County  establishes the following appeal procedures under RCW 43.21C.060, 43.21C.075, and 43.21C.080 and WAC 197-11-680. Persons considering either administrative or judicial appeal of any decision that involves SEPA are advised to read these statutory and administrative rule provisions. 
(b)   Appeal of the intermediate steps under SEPA (e.g., lead agency determination, scoping, draft EIS adequacy) shall not be allowed.
(c)   Appeals of SEPA procedures shall be limited to review of a final threshold determination (DS, DNS or Mitigated DNS) or Final EIS. These appeals may occur prior toSpokane County's  final decision on a proposed action. 
(d)   Only one administrative appeal of a threshold determination or of the adequacy of an EIS is allowed; successive administrative appeals within the County    5   

__________
5  City of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane Regional Health District,  and  Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority  will insert the appropriate reference. 

__________
are not allowed. This limitation does not apply to administrative appeals before another agency. This limitation also does not apply to closed record appeals authorized in subsection (e) of this section.6 

__________
6  The last sentence shall apply only to the City of Spokane and Spokane County.

__________
(e)   A closed record appeal is allowed to theBoard of County Commissioners    7   

__________
7  City of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane Regional Health District,  and  Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority  will insert the appropriate reference. 

__________
of any decision by theSpokane County  hearing examiner conditioning or denying a proposal under authority of SEPA, if the Hearing Examiner's decision on the underlying governmental action is subject to a closed record appeal to the Board of County Commissioners. The appeal shall be consolidated with any appeal of the underlying governmental action.  8   

__________
8  This provision shall apply only to the City of Spokane and Spokane County.

__________
(f)   Except as provided in subsections (e) and (g) of this section, any allowed appeals of procedural and substantive determinations under SEPA shall be consolidated with a hearing on, or appeal of, the underlying governmental action in a single open record hearing before theSpokane County hearing examiner  .  9  The hearing or appeal shall be one at which the  Spokane County hearing examiner  will render a decision on the proposed action. For example, an appeal of the adequacy of an EIS must be consolidated with a hearing on or appeal of  Spokane County's decision on the proposed action, if both proceedings  are allowed in the  County  procedures. If  Spokane County's  procedures do not provide for a hearing on or appeal of the underlying governmental action, such agency shall not hold a SEPA administrative appeal, except as allowed in subsection g of this section. 

__________
9  City of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane Regional Health District,  and  Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority  will insert the appropriate reference. 

__________
(g)   The following appeals of SEPA procedural or substantive determinations shall not be consolidated with a hearing on or appeal of the underlying action.
(1)   An appeal of a determination of significance (DS).
(2)   An appeal of a procedural determination made bySpokane County  when it is the project proponent or is funding a project and chooses to conduct its review under SEPA, including any appeals of its procedural determinations, prior to submitting an application for a project permit. Subsequent appeals of substantive determinations by an agency with jurisdiction over the proposed project shall be allowed under the SEPA appeal procedures of the agency with jurisdiction. 
(3)   An appeal of a procedural determination made bySpokane County  on a nonproject action. 
(4)   An appeal where the underlying action is a ministerial permit decision that does not require a public hearing.
(b)   For threshold determinations issued prior to a decision on a project action, any administrative appeal allowed under Section 11.10.170 shall be filed within fourteen days after the determination has been made and is appealable. Any administrative appeal of a procedural or substantive determination under SEPA issued at the same time as the decision on the project action shall be filed within fourteen days after notice of the decision has been made and is appealable. In order to allow public comment on a DNS prior to requiring an administrative appeal to be filed, this appeal period shall be extended for an additional seven days if the appeal is of a DNS for which public comment period is required under the provisions of the ordinance codified in this chapter or WAC Chapter 197-11. Nothing in this subsection alters the requirements of subsections (g) and (f) of this section.
(i)   Procedural determinations made by the responsible official shall be entitled to substantial weight in any appeal proceeding.
(j)   For any appeal under this section,Spokane County  shall provide for the preparation of a record for use in any subsequent appeal proceedings, which record shall consist at a minimum the following. 
(1)   Findings and conclusions.
(2)   Testimony under oath.
(3)   A taped, electronically recorded, or written transcript.
(k)   If an administrative appeal of determinations relating to SEPA is available under the procedures of Section 11.10.170, that procedure must be used before any person may seek judicial review of any SEPA issue that could have been reviewed under such procedures.
(l)   Judicial appeals of procedural and substantive compliance with SEPA must comply with RCW 43.21C.075 and WAC 197-11-680(4).
(1)   Spokane County  shall give official notice under WAC 197-11-680(5) of the date and place for commencing a judicial appeal if there is a time established by statute or such agency's regulations for commencing a judicial appeal of the underlying governmental action. 
(2)   Pursuant to RCW 43.21C.080, notice of any action taken bySpokane County  may be publicized by such agency or the applicant for, or the proponent of, such action. The form of the notice shall substantially conform to the form provided in Section 11.10.230(f). 
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

ARTICLE VIII.  DEFINITIONS

11.10.175  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
This article contains uniform usage and definitions of terms under SEPA.Spokane County  adopts the following sections by reference, as supplemented by Section 11.10.177. 
TABLE INSET:

    WAC        
197-11-700   Definitions.   
197-11-702   Act.   
197-11-704   Action.   
197-11-706   Addendum.   
197-11-708   Adoption.   
197-11-710   Affected tribe.   
197-11-712   Affecting.   
197-11-714   Agency.   
197-11-716   Applicant.   
197-11-718   Built environment.   
197-11-720   Categorical exemption.   
197-11-721   Closed record appeal.   
197-11-722   Consolidated appeal.   
197-11-724   Consulted agency.   
197-11-726   Cost/benefit analysis.   
197-11-728   County/city.   
197-11-730   Decision maker.   
197-11-732   Department.   
197-11-734   Determination of nonsignificance (DNS).   
197-11-736   Determination of significance (DS).   
197-11-738   EIS.   
197-11-740   Environment.   
197-11-742   Environmental checklist.   
197-11-744   Environmental document.   
197-11-746   Environmental review.   
197-11-750   Expanded scoping.   
197-11-752   Impacts.   
197-11-754   Incorporation by reference.   
197-11-756   Lands covered by water.   
197-11-758   Lead agency.   
197-11-760   License.   
197-11-762   Local agency.   
197-11-764   Major action.   
197-11-766   Mitigated DNS.   
197-11-768   Mitigation.   
197-11-770   Natural environment.   
197-11-772   NEPA.   
197-11-774   Nonproject.   
197-11-775   Open record hearing.   
197-11-776   Phased review.   
197-11-778   Preparation.   
197-11-780   Private project.   
197-11-782   Probable.   
197-11-784   Proposal.   
197-11-786   Reasonable alternative.   
197-11-788   Responsible official.   
197-11-790   SEPA.   
197-11-792   Scope.   
197-11-793   Scoping.   
197-11-794   Significant.   
197-11-796   State agency.   
197-11-797   Threshold determination.   
197-11-799   Underlying governmental action.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.177  Additional definitions.
In addition to those definitions contained within WAC 197-11-700 through WAC 197-11-799, when used in the ordinance codified in this chapter the following terms shall have the following meanings unless the context indicates otherwise:
(a)   "Agency" or "agencies" means the adopting jurisdictions, depending on the context.
(b)   "Department" means any division, subdivision or organizational unit of the agencies established by ordinance, rule or order.
(c)   "Early notice" means the lead agency's response to an applicant stating whether it considers issuance of a determination of significance likely for the applicant's proposal (Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance [DNS] procedures).
(d)   "Ordinance" means the ordinance, resolution, rules or other procedure used by the city of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane regional health district, and Spokane County air pollution control authority to adopt regulatory requirements.
(e)   "SEPA rules" means Chapter 197-11 WAC adopted by the department of ecology.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

ARTICLE IX.  CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS

11.10.180  Adoption by reference.
Spokane County  adopts by reference the following rules for categorical exemptions, as supplemented in the ordinance codified in this chapter, to include Sections 11.10.070, 11.10.080, and 11.10.190. See Appendix B for an example list of exempt and nonexempt activities. 
TABLE INSET:

    WAC        
197-11-800   Categorical exemptions.   
197-11-880   Emergencies.   
197-11-890   Petitioning DOE to change exemptions.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.182  Certification of emergencies.
The responsible official shall certify on a case-by-case basis those actions which meet the conditions prescribed in WAC 197-11-880 and are declared emergencies.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

ARTICLE X.  AGENCY COMPLIANCE

11.10.185  Purpose of this article and adoption by reference.
This article contains rules forSpokane County  compliance with SEPA, including rules for charging fees under the SEPA process, designating critical areas, listing agencies with environmental expertise, selecting the lead agency, and applying these rules to current agency activities.  Spokane County  adopts the following sections by reference: 
TABLE INSET:

    WAC        
197-11-900   Purpose of this article.   
197-11-902   Agency SEPA policies.   
197-11-916   Application to ongoing actions.   
197-11-920   Agencies with environmental expertise.   
197-11-922   Lead agency rules.   
197-11-924   Determining the lead agency.   
197-11-926   Lead agency for governmental proposals.   
197-11-928   Lead agency for public and private proposals.   
197-11-930   Lead agency for private projects with one agency with jurisdiction.   
197-11-932   Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from more than one agency when one of the agencies is a county/city.   
197-11-934   Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from a local agency, not a county/city, and one or more state agencies.   
197-11-936   Lead agency for private projects requiring licenses from more than one state agency.   
197-11-938   Lead agencies for specific proposals.   
197-11-940   Transfer of lead agency status to a state agency.   
197-11-942   Agreements on lead agency status.   
197-11-944   Agreements on division of lead agency duties.   
197-11-946   DOE resolution of lead agency disputes.   
197-11-948   Assumption of lead agency status.   
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.190  Critical areas.
The maps, rules, and regulations set forth in theSpokane County  critical areas ordinance, as amended, designate the location of environmentally sensitive areas within  Spokane County  . Proposals that will be located within critical areas are to be treated no differently than other proposals under the ordinance codified in this chapter. A threshold determination shall be made for all such actions, and an EIS shall not be automatically required for a proposal merely because it is proposed for location in a critical area. 
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.200  Fees.
(a)   Spokane County  exercises the option presented in WAC 197-11-914 to recover all or a substantial portion of the costs of SEPA compliance as regards a private proposal in the manner detailed below. 
(b)   Public notices. The full cost of giving public notices shall be recovered from, or borne by, the proponent of private proposals subject to the ordinance codified in this chapter.
(c)   Threshold determination. The city of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane regional health district, and Spokane County air pollution control authority may, through separate ordinances, resolutions, or rules, establish fees to recover expenses from the applicant. These established fees shall accompany each completed environmental checklist submitted toSpokane County  . The time periods provided by the ordinance codified in this chapter for making a threshold determination shall not begin to run until payment of a fee is received. 
(d)   When an EIS is required for a private proposal, the applicant shall comply with Sections 11.10.120 and 11.10.122. Each jurisdiction may recover from the applicant such costs as are reasonable and associated with (1) scoping, (2) preparation of a DEIS and/or SDEIS, (3) review/comment responses, (4) any separate public hearing, (5) preparation of the FEIS and/or FSEIS and (6) any miscellaneous costs identified by the responsible official. Fee(s) to recover such costs shall be based on the staff time spent on the project using established rates, and may include printing and/or mailing costs. A deposit as set forth in an adopted fee schedule, against which administrative and other costs will be applied, shall be deposited with theSpokane County  before production of an EIS will begin. Such other deposits as are necessary to cover administrative costs will be made as monies on deposit are depleted. Production of the EIS may be suspended in the event additional monies are not deposited upon request. 
(e)   Spokane County  shall not collect a fee for performing its duties as a consulted agency. 
(f)   Spokane County  may charge any person for copies of any document prepared under the ordinance codified in this chapter and for mailing the document in a manner provided by RCW Chapter 42.17. 
(g)   Each jurisdiction shall adopt fees for the implementation of the ordinance codified in this chapter pursuant to its own procedures.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.210  Amending the ordinance codified in this chapter.
The ordinance codified in this chapter may be amended by initiative of the city of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane regional health district, and/or Spokane County air pollution control authority when it is necessary to reflect changes in local conditions or when RCW Chapter 43.21C or WAC Chapter 197-11 is amended. When anagency  seeks to amend the ordinance codified in this chapter, it shall submit such proposal to the other participating jurisdictions. Each jurisdiction will appoint a representative to an interlocal amendment committee, which will develop mutually agreeable amendment language. The interlocal amendment committee will recommend the amendment to each of the other jurisdictions for adoption. The interlocal amendment committee will remain active until the amendment is adopted by each of the city of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane regional health district and Spokane County air pollution control authority or until it is determined to discontinue pursuing the amendment, at which time it shall be disbanded. 
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.215  SEPA public information.
Spokane County  shall retain all documents required by the SEPA rules (WAC Chapter 197-11) and make them available in accordance with RCW Chapter 42.17. The various SEPA documents shall be retained as they may be associated with the particular file cases either generally by  Spokane County  or handled as licenses or permits for  Spokane County  in accordance with the pertinent statute of limitations regarding such files. Any of the city of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane regional health district, or Spokane County air pollution control authority may establish a reference file of pertinent SEPA documents to be filed in a single place and made available to the public. 
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

11.10.220  Severability.
If any provision of the ordinance codified in this chapter or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the ordinance codified in this chapter, or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances, shall not be affected.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)

ARTICLE XI.  FORMS

11.10.230  Adoption by reference.
Spokane County  adopts the following forms for use in carrying out the local SEPA procedures. These forms may be amended administratively provided there is concurrency between the city of Spokane, Spokane County, Spokane regional health district and Spokane County air pollution control authority. 
(a)   Spokane environmental checklist;
(b)   Spokane adoption notice;
(c)   Spokane determination of nonsignificance (DNS/Optional DNS);
(d)   Spokane determination of significance and scoping notice (DS);
(e)   Spokane notice of assumption of lead agency status;
(f)   Spokane notice of action.
See Appendix C for samples of MDNS, Supplements, and Addendums forms not adopted by the ordinance codified in this chapter that serve for example purposes only.
(Res. 02-1098 Attachment A (part), 2002: Res. 84-0823 Attachment A (part), 1984)
APPENDIX A
SPOKANE COUNTY SEPA POLICIES
This document entitled "Spokane County SEPA Policies" is adopted and may be amended pursuant to section WAC 197-11-902 by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners. It is the plans, rules and regulations, and all amendments thereto, for the application of substantive authority pursuant to 11.10.160.
1. Spokane County Code;
2. Spokane County Comprehensive Plan and Urban Growth Areas, and neighborhood subarea plans;.
3. Spokane County Shoreline Program;
4. Spokane County Critical Areas Ordinance;
5. Spokane County Zoning Code;
6. Spokane County Subdivision Ordinance;
7. Spokane County Capital Facilities Plan;
8. Spokane County Comprehensive Wastewater Management Plan;
9. Spokane County Coordinated Water System Plan, RCW Chapter 70.116 and 90.03, and Title 246, WAC;
10. Spokane County Comprehensive Solid Waste Management Plan;
11. Spokane County Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan;
12. Spokane Aquifer Water Quality Management Plan (208 Plan);
13. Spokane County Hearing Examiner Ordinance;
14. Spokane County Sanitary Sewer;
15. Spokane County Standards for Road and Sewer Construction;
16. Stormwater Management Plans, as adopted by Spokane County;
17. Guidelines for Spokane County Stormwater Management;
18. Spokane County Stormwater Control Ordinances;
19. Spokane County Utility Accommodation Policy;
20. Critical Materials Handbook, as referenced in Title 3 of the Spokane County Code;
21. Spokane County Department of Public Works, Engineering Division, Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program;
22. Spokane Area Wellhead Protection Program;
23. RCW Chapter 84.34, Open Space, Agricultural, Timber Lands-Current Uses-Conservation Futures, and WAC Chapter 458-30;
24. RCW Chapter 90.58, Shoreline Management Act of 1971, and WAC Chapters 173-14,173-16, 173-18, 173-19, 173-20 and 173-22;
25. RCW Chapter 43.21C, State Environmental Policy, and WAC Chapter 197-11;
26. Title 58 RCW, Boundaries and Plats;
27. Spokane County Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance;
28. RCW Chapter 19.27, State Building Code, as locally amended, adopted, administered and enforced;
29. RCW Chapter 76.09, 34.05, 43.21C.037, Forest Practices;
30. Spokane County Timber Harvest Ordinance;
31. WAC Chapter 173-60, Maximum Environmental Noise Levels;
32. Spokane County Flood Damage Protection Ordinance;
33. Recommendations and positions based upon memorandums of agreement between Spokane County and other jurisdictions including Fairchild Air Force Base;
34. Reports, technical studies, and/or maps found in the "Soil Survey -- Spokane County, Washington," published materials by the Natural Resources Conservation Service and Department of Natural Resources;
35. The National Rifle Association Range Sourcebook regarding safe shooting ranges;
36. The National Fire Code published by the National Fire Protection Association, including any referenced publications/documents;
37. Any technical books or publications used as reference material in the administration/enforcement of RCW Chapter 19.27;
APPENDIX B
SEPA EXEMPTION LEVELS MATRIX (INFORMATIONAL ONLY)
The following matrix serves for informational purposes only and should not be interpreted as law. Departments may administratively update this matrix for their own information. See Washington Administrative Code (WAC) chapter 197-11, and the provisions set forth in this ordinance for specific SEPA exemption rules and regulations.
TABLE INSET:

  ACTIVITY   EXEMPT   NON-EXEMPT   
Rezone      X   
Special Permit Use Permit When Project Meets Flexible Thresholds   X      
Variances (Not including change in use or density)   X      
Short Plats or Short Subdivisions   X  1        
Short Plat Within Land Previously Platted      X   
License for Discharge to Water      X   
Activities Critical Areas      X  2     
Annexation Into A City   X      
License for Discharge to Air      X   
<20 Dwelling Units   X      
Agricultural Buildings < 20,000 Square Foot   X      
Office, School, Commercial, Recreational, Service, Storage Buildings < 12,000 Square Feet And Up to 40 Parking Spaces   X      
Parking Lots < 40 Parking Spaces   X      
Landfills And Excavations < 500 Cubic Yards   X      
Transit Stops   X      
Signs And Signals   X      
Minor Road Repair Including Pedestrian and Bike Facilities   X      
Additions To Building Below the Flexible Thresholds   X      
Building Demolition Below Flexible Thresholds   X      
Demolition of Buildings of Historic Significance      X   
Underground Tanks < 10,000 gallons   X      
Vacation of Streets And Roads   X      
Hydrological Measuring Devises   X      
Survey and Boundary Markers   X      
Repair, Remodeling, Maintenance or Existing Structures   X  1        
Minor Repair or Replacement of Structures   X  1        
Dredging      X   
Reconstruction/ Maintenance Shoreline Protection Measures      X   
Replacement of Utilities/Utility Lines   X  3        
Repair/Rebuilding Dams, Dikes or Reservoirs      X   
Water Rights and Structures For < 50 c/f/s of Surface Water for Irrigation   X      
Water Rights and Structures For 1 c/f/s or 2,250 g/p/m or Ground Water   X      
Sale, Transfer, Exchange or Lease of Land   X      
Closure of Schools (Plan)   X      
Open Burning   X      
Variances Under the Clean Air Act   X      
Issuance, Renewal, Revision of Air Operating Permit   X      
Water Quality Certifications   X      
Activities of Fire and Law Enforcement Exempt Construction   X      
Proposal or Adoption of Rules, Regulations, Resolutions Ordinance or Plan Relating To Procedures and Contains No Standards   X      
Adoption of State Building Codes   X      
Adoption of Noise Ordinances   X      
Installation, Construction, Relocation Of Utilities Except The Following:
1. Communication Towers or Relay Stations
2. Stormwater, Water and Sewer with lines > 8 inches
3. Electrical Facilities and Lines > 55,000 Volts
   
X  1        
Grants Of Franchise By Agencies To Utilities   X      
Class I, II, II Forest Practice Permits/Regulations   X      
Recreational Sites Development < 12 Campsites   X      
Watershed Restoration Projects Pursuant To a Restoration Plan   X      
Microcell Attached To Structure- No Residence or School On-site   X      
Personal Wireless Service Antennas Attached To Structure- No Residence or School On-site And in a Commercial, Industrial, Forest of Agricultural Zone.   X      
Personal Wireless Service Tower < 60 Feet in a Commercial, Industrial, Forest or Agricultural Zone.   X      
1. Applies to land not covered by water.
2. Under section WAC 197-11-305, each County/City may adopt provisions to exclude exemptions listed in 197-11-800 for those sites listed in Critical Areas.
3. Some utility replacements are non exempt. See WAC for specifics (i.e. replacement of transmission line for natural gas is not exempt).
APPENDIX C
ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL FORMS
EXAMPLES ONLY, NOT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED   
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
ADMINISTRATIVE AGREEMENT (EXAMPLE ONLY)
THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between: Spokane County, a unit of local government of the State of Washington, having offices for the transaction of business at West 1116 Broadway, Spokane, Washington 99260, hereinafter referred to as the "Agency";__________,
having offices for the transaction of business at__________,
hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant"; and__________,
having offices for the transaction of business at__________,
hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant"; all jointly hereinafter referred to as the "Parties";
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act of 1971, as amended, and the Washington Administrative Code, Chapter 197-11, the Agency has prepared and adopted local SEPA rules, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to these rules, when an environmental impact statement is required for a private proposal, the Agency will select a consultant and direct the production thereof and require that the Applicant reimburse the Agency for certain costs as stipulated in the Spokane Environmental Ordinance which are related to the preparation of the draft EIS, review of comment responses, preparation of the final EIS and public hearings, as well as certain miscellaneous operating costs; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant hereinabove has agreed to undertake the preparation of an EIS through the Agency's selection of a Consultant, and in conjunction therewith desires to formalize with the Agency his obligation to reimburse the Agency for the cost of the consultant and certain administrative costs in conjunction with the preparation of the draft EIS, comments on the same and preparation of the final EIS; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant recognizes that the Consultant works under the direction of the Agency and that the EIS may well contain information, project alternatives and mitigating measures resulting in conditions of project approval deemed undesirable by the Applicant or that project denial may actually occur;
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual promises set forth hereinafter, the parties hereto do agree as follows.
1. The Applicant recognizes his responsibility and legal obligation to assist the Agency in the full production of an EIS through the Agency's selection of a Consultant, as set forth within the Agency's SEPA rules for the following-described project:
__________
__________
__________,
hereinafter referred to as the "Proposal."
2. The parties recognize the Consultant-Agency relationship and that the EIS is being prepared as much or more with the enhancement of the environment and general well-being of the public in mind as with the Applicant's interests and well-being.
3. The Parties recognize that the Agency, pursuant to its SEPA rules, shall recover from the Applicant such costs incurred by the Agency in administering (1) the preparation of the draft EIS and/or SDEIS for the proposal; (2) the review comment responses related to the draft EIS and/or SDEIS for the proposal; (3) public hearing-related costs; (4) the preparation of the final EIS and/or SDEIS for the proposal and (5) miscellaneous operating costs which the Agency shall perform in conjunction with the above administrative functions, either as a result of state laws, agency ordinances or at the request of the Applicant.
4. The basis for all charges in paragraph 3 hereinabove shall be as follows.
a. Upper-level staff time will be at the hourly rate paid to agency staff members providing such services. In computing the hourly rate, all fringe benefits will be included.
b. Miscellaneous operating costs shall be those costs actually incurred by the Agency in production and circulation of the EIS, including but not necessarily limited to, other department (within the Agency) employees' salaries (computed in the manner set forth in subparagraph a above), actual costs of materials (paper, stamps and envelopes) and/or miscellaneous expenses.
5. The applicant shall deposit an initial amount of ________ with the responsible official for the Agency for payment of all costs as set forth in paragraph 3. The responsible official for the Agency, after receiving the monies, will transmit said monies to the Agency Treasurer, who will deposit the monies in the Agency Current Expense Fund. The responsible official shall maintain a separate ledger of expenses for this proposal. No agency staff member will participate with the Applicant or the Consultant in the administrative responsibilities of the Agency as the Lead Agency pursuant to the agency SEPA rules until the Applicant has signed this agreement and deposited with the Agency said initial deposit amount or such additional monies as provided for herein.
Whenever the ledger account set up pursuant to the terms of this agreement declines from the ________ deposited to an amount of ________, the Applicant agrees upon request to deposit an additional sum of ________ which shall be deposited in the same manner as the initial deposit. This process shall be repeated as often as necessary.
The Agency reserves the right to cease production of and/or to not issue the DEIS or FEIS in the event of nonpayment of the above fees.
If, after completion of the functions called for within the agency SEPA rules by the Agency, there still remains money on account for the proposal, the Agency shall pay over all remaining monies to the Applicant.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed on the _________ day of _________, 20________.
BOARD OF SPOKANE
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TABLE INSET:

  __________   __________
Consultant Name
   
__________   __________
Consultant Signature
   
__________   __________
Applicant Name
   
ATTEST:__________   __________
Applicant Signature
   
__________
(Title)
   
fcu-envirnmntl ord-10/22/02
MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE "MDNS"
(EXAMPLE ONLY)
FILE NO(S):
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSAL:
PUBLIC HEARING SCHEDULED FOR:
PROPONENT:
LOCATION OF PROPOSAL, INCLUDING STREET ADDRESS, IF ANY:
LEAD AGENCY: SPOKANE COUNTY
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment if mitigated as stipulated below. An Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
( )  There is no comment period for this MDNS; pursuant to WAC 197-11-350 (1).
( )  This MDNS is issued under WAC 197-11-350 (2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for at least 15 days from the date issued (below). Comments regarding this MDNS must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m.,      , 20  , if they are intended to alter the MDNS.
Mitigating Measures:
1.
2.
3.
I acknowledge the above mitigating measures to be modifications and adjustments to the above described proposal and warrant that I will not oppose, object to or contest these measures in the future.
TABLE INSET:

  Date:   Printed/Typed Name:   
Signature:      
**********
Responsible Official: JIM MANSON by
Position/Title:           Phone: (509) 477-3675 
Address: West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260
Date Issued:   Signature: 
**********
APPEAL OF THIS DETERMINATION, after it becomes final, may be made to the Spokane County Hearing Examiner, West 1026 Broadway, Spokane, WA 99260. The appeal deadline is ten (10) calendar days after the signing of the Decision. This appeal must be written and make specific factual objections. Contact the Division of Building & Code Enforcement for assistance with the specifics of a SEPA appeal.
**********
A copy of the MDNS was mailed to:.
APPENDIX D
SUMMARY OF SEPA PROCESS
TABLE INSET:

  Is SEPA required?   Is the entire proposal defined?   WAC 197-11-060   
Is there an agency "action"?   WAC 197-11-704   
Is the action "categorically exempt"?   11.10.070, 11.10.080, 11.10.180 and 11.10.190   
Has SEPA already been completed?   WAC 197-11-164, and 11.10.150 and 11.10.160   
Who is lead agency?   Identify the "lead agency."   11.10.040 through 11.10.055   
Are there likely to be impacts?   Review the checklist and identify likely significant adverse environmental impacts.   WAC 197-11-330   
Are there existing documents that analyze the impacts?   Identify documents that analyze probable impacts of the proposal.   WAC 197-11-600 and 330(2)(a)   
Can impacts be mitigated?   Identify mitigation required by development regulations, and other local and state laws.   WAC 197-11-158, and 11.10.100   
Is the applicant willing to change the proposal to reduce impacts?   11.10.100   
Consider using SEPA substantive authority for other impacts not adequately addressed.   11.10.160   
After application of identified mitigation, is the proposal likely to have any significant adverse environmental impact?   If not, issue a determination of nonsignificance (which may include mitigation measures).   WAC 197-11-340, 350, and 355   
If yes, issue a determination of significance, and either include an adoption notice or begin the EIS process.   WAC 197-11-360 and 11.10.120 through 11.10.126   
How is SEPA used in decision-making?   Mitigation under SEPA must be included as permit conditions, or in changes to permit applications for the proposal.   11.10.160   
Projects may be denied if identified significant adverse impacts cannot be mitigated.   11.10.160   
APPENDIX D
SEPA PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT REQUIREMENTS
TABLE INSET:

  DOCUMENT   Comment Period?   Public Notice?   Distribution?      
Determination of non-significance (DNS)   14-day comment period may be required   If comment period required   If comment period required   See WAC 197-11-340(2) for criteria on whether a comment period is required   
Mitigated DNS   14 days   Yes   Yes   WAC 197-11-340 and 350   
Optional DNS process            WAC 197-11-355   
Notice with the notice of application (NOA)   Combined with NOA (14 to 30 days)   Yes   Yes      
DNS issued after NOA   Optional 14 days   If a comment period is given   Yes      
DNS integrated with GMA planning document   Combined with GMA document (14 to 60 days)   Yes   Yes   WAC 197-11-230(1) and (4)   
Modified DNS   No   No   Yes   WAC 197-11-340(2)(f)   
DNS after withdrawal of a DS   14 days   Yes   Yes   WAC 197-11-360(4) and 340(2)(iv)   
Determination of significance (DS) with Scoping notice   21 days, up to 30 days for "expanded scoping"   Yes   Yes   WAC 197-11-360, 408, and 410   
DS/Scoping notice with NOA   Combined with NOA (14 to 30 days)   Yes   Yes   WAC 197-11-408   
Draft environmental impact statement (EIS)   30 days, with possible 15-day extension   Yes   Yes   WAC 197-11-455   
Draft EIS integrated with GMA planning document   Combined with GMA document (30 to 60 days)   Yes   Yes   WAC 197-11-230(1) and (4)   
Supplemental draft EIS   30 days, with possible 15-day extension   Yes   Yes   WAC 197-11-620(1) and 455   
Final EIS   No, but a 7-day waiting period is required before agency action   No   Yes   WAC 197-11-460   
Final supplemental EIS   No, but 7-day wait   No   Yes   WAC 197-11-620(1) and 460   
Final EIS integrated with GMA planning document   No, and no 7-day wait   No   Yes   WAC 197-11-230(5)   
Adoption Notice with DNS   14-day comment period may be required   If comment period required   If comment period required   WAC 197-11-340(2) and 630   
Adoption notice with DS   No, but 7-day wait is required   No   Yes   WAC 197-11-630(3)   
Addendum to a DNS   No   No   Encouraged   WAC 197-11-625(5)   
Addendum to a EIS   No   No   May be required, always encouraged   See WAC 197-11-625 for criteria requiring distribution   
Agencies may extend any comment period for their own proposals, WAC 197-11-050(7).
SPOKANE COUNTY
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT (SEPA) ADMINISTRATION
2002 FEE SCHEDULE
This fee schedule is adopted by Spokane County pursuant to 11.10.200 and WAC Chapter 197-11-914. The fee schedule is adopted by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners and is not part of the Spokane Environmental Ordinance.
PART A - FEE TABLE
Environmental (SEPA) Review Fees
A minimum deposit equal to ________ may be required from which the following environmental review fees shall be withdrawn. If the deposit falls below a sum equal to the minimum fee plus twice the hourly rate, an additional deposit may be required. Alternatively, the applicant may be billed directly for time in excess of one (1) hour review time.
TABLE INSET:

  1. Threshold Determination (DNS/MDNS/DS)..........   $75 minimum plus hourly rate*   
2. Review of Special Studies for Threshold Determination..........   hourly rate*   
3. Published legal notice in the newspaper when required..........   actual cost   
* Current hourly rate is $74
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
Preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement shall be charged at the actual cost to the department including consultant cost, administrative costs and cost of review by other county departments and governmental agencies.
Appeal
TABLE INSET:

  Administrative appeal..........   $262   
PART B - FEE ADMINISTRATION
1. Each action listed above will constitute a separate action for which a fee will be collected.
2. All minimum fees and deposits will be paid at the time of application. Hourly rate fees will be paid from the required deposit and/or billed to the applicant directly and paid before a final decision is made or findings signed.
3. Hourly rate for review shall be to reimburse any staff time required to complete a checklist beyond one (1) hour.
4. Hourly rates will be rounded to the nearest 1-hour except for hours less than ½, which will be computed as ½ hour.
5. Annual Modification of Fee Schedule. Minimum fees, hourly rates and minimum deposits shall be administratively adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index West B/C for population sizes of 1,500,000 and under (its base is December 1996 at 100), and other reasonable considerations agree to by the Divisions of Public Works Directors. Modifications shall take place January 1 of each year.
6. The fee for an administrative appeal of a threshold determination shall be automatically adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index West B/C for population sizes of 1,500,000 and under (its base is December 1996 at 100), and should be consistent with the Division of Planning's fee for an appeal of an administrative decision to the Hearing Examiner.
7. Minimum deposit for the administrative costs of preparing an Environmental Impact Statement on a private project shall be $800. If the deposit falls below $100, additional increments will be required. Administrative costs for preparing an Environmental Impact Statement shall be exempt from the annual modification of fee schedule.
8. Minimum deposit for consultant costs and cost of review on private projects shall be computed based on the agreement for the consultant selected to prepare the Environmental Impact Statement.
9. The responsible official may authorize refunding any fee paid pursuant to this fee schedule which was erroneously paid or collected.

Chapter 11.16  AQUIFER FEES
Sections:
11.16.010  Legislative history--Intent.
11.16.020  Billing procedure.
11.16.030  Collection of liens.
11.16.040  Severability.

11.16.010  Legislative history--Intent.
In 1985, the voters of Spokane County approved the formation of the aquifer protection area of Spokane County, and authorized the imposition of monthly fees on property owners in order to finance the activities of the aquifer protection area. Pursuant to Spokane County Resolution No. 86-0614 and as amended by Spokane County Resolution Nos. 96-1212, 98-0554 and 01-1187, the board of county commissioners approved certain billing policies in connection with the collection of these fees. Under these policies, the billing and collection of these fees has been carried out by the Spokane County division of utilities. Under Spokane County Resolution No. 96-317, the board of county commissioners has directed that the responsibility for billing and collecting aquifer protection area fees designated in Spokane County be transferred from the division of utilities to the Spokane County treasurer, commencing in calendar year 1997, including the authority of the county treasurer under RCW Section 84-56.035 to bill such fees along with the notice of property taxes due the county. It is the purpose of this chapter to formally adopt the policies and procedures through which the county treasurer carries out these functions.
(Res. 01-1187 Attachment A, 2001; Res. 96-1185 Exhibit A § 1, 1997)

11.16.020  Billing procedure.
(a)   Commencing January 1, 1997, the Spokane County treasurer shall be responsible for the billing and collection of aquifer protection area fees. The aquifer fee shall be displayed and billed on the annual property tax statement for the parcel, and shall be mailed to the name and address shown on the real property tax roll at the time annual property tax bills are prepared. Parcels which are exempt from property taxes and do not receive an annual property tax statement will be billed for the aquifer fee and/or other fees. If a payment less than the sum of the total property tax, plus aquifer fee or less than the sum of one-half of the property tax, plus one-half of the aquifer fee is received for a combined property tax and aquifer fee, and an individual has not otherwise specified, the county treasurer shall first apply the payment to the annual property tax of the parcel pursuant to the provisions of RCW Chapter 84.56 and then apply any remaining amount to the aquifer fee or other fees.
(b)   The total amount of the aquifer fee shall be due and payable to the county treasurer on or before the 30th day of April, and shall be delinquent after that date; however, if one-half of such aquifer fee is paid on or before the 30th day of April, the remainder shall be due and payable on or before the 31st day of October, and shall be delinquent after that date.
(c)   Commencing in 1998, the property tax statement shall designate the amount of any aquifer fee that is past due. In addition, the property tax statement shall contain the following explanation relating to the aquifer fee:
AQUIFER. This is a fee, not a tax. The revenues from this charge are used to provide a financing method to preserve, protect and rehabilitate the Spokane Rathdrum Aquifer as provided for in RCW 36.36. A lien may be imposed for any fee at least eighteen months delinquent per RCW 36.36.045. The lien shall be foreclosed in the same manner as property tax liens RCW 36.94.150.
(Res. 96-1185 Attachment A § 2, 1997)

11.16.030  Collection of liens.
All liens created for delinquent aquifer fees pursuant to RCW Section 36.36.045 shall be collected by county treasurer in accordance with the procedures set forth in RCW Section 36.94.150.
(Res. 96-1185 Attachment A § 3, 1997)

11.16.040  Severability.
If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter should be held invalid or unconstitutional, the validity or constitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter.
(Res. 96-1185 Attachment A § 4, 1997)

Chapter 11.17  SPOKANE--RATHDRUM AQUIFER PROTECTION AREA
Sections:
11.17.010  Definitions.
11.17.020  Establishment of the Spokane--Rathdrum aquifer protection area.
11.17.030  Imposition of monthly fees for the withdrawal of water and on-site sewage disposal within the APA.
11.17.040  Use of moneys generated from APA fees.
11.17.050  Billing of APA fees.
11.17.060  Collection of liens.
11.17.070  Contract with Spokane County treasurer.
11.17.080  Effective date.
11.17.090  Severability.

11.17.010  Definitions.
As used in this chapter, the following terms, unless the context otherwise dictates, shall have the following meanings:
"Household unit" means a building or portion thereof designed exclusively for residential purposes on a permanent basis as distinguished from a transient basis and which therefore does not include hotels, motels, dormitories or convalescent homes or accessory buildings or structures. It will consist of one or more rooms designed, occupied or intended for occupancy as separate living quarters, with an individual entrance, cooking, sleeping and sanitary facilities provided within the unit for the exclusive use of one family maintaining a household.
"Nonhousehold units" mean any building not designed exclusively for residential purposes as a "household unit(s)." (Res. 05-1046 § 1, 2005)

11.17.020  Establishment of the Spokane--Rathdrum aquifer protection area.
There is created, as authorized by the voters of Spokane County at the general election held on November 2, 2004, an aquifer protection area to be known as the "Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer Protection Area," hereinafter referred to as the "APA." The boundaries of the APA are set forth in Attachment "1," attached to the resolution codified in this chapter and incorporated in this chapter by reference. Such attachment includes a map depicting the boundaries as well as a listing of all the presently existing voting precincts within the boundaries. All of the boundaries of the APA, as of the effective date of this chapter, will continue to pay those fees set forth in Section 11.17.030 of this chapter regardless of whether they are subsequently annexed into a city or town that is not within the APA.
(Res. 05-1046 § 2, 2005)

11.17.030  Imposition of monthly fees for the withdrawal of water and on-site sewage disposal within the APA.
There is imposed a fee for the withdrawal of water from properties within the APA at one dollar and twenty-five cents per household unit per month for twenty years and a fee for on-site sewage disposal by properties within the APA of one dollar and twenty-five cents per household unit per month for twenty years.
Each household unit, regardless of the water meter size serving the unit or whether or not there is a water meter serving the unit, shall be charged a fee of one dollar and twenty-five cents per month for twenty years for the withdrawal of water and a fee for on-site sewage disposal for one dollar and twenty-five cents per household unit per month for twenty years. No household unit shall be charged that on-site sewage disposal fee set forth in this section whose effluent is treated by a regional sewage treatment facility, Spokane County sewage system, the city of Spokane sewage system, Liberty Lake Sewer District sewage system or city of Millwood sewage system.
Each nonhousehold unit shall be charged a fee per month for twenty years for the withdrawal of water and the same fee per month for twenty years for on-site sewage disposal based upon the water meter size serving the property. The following water meter sizes and fees are adopted:
TABLE INSET:

  METER SIZE   MONTHLY FEE   
3/4 inch   $ 1.25   
1 inch   $ 2.50   
1- 1/2 inches   $ 5.00   
2 inches   $10.00   
3 inches   $20.00   
4 inches   $37.50   
5 inches   $56.25   
6 inches or larger   $80.00   
Any nonhousehold unit not having a water meter shall be charged that fee, as determined by the Spokane County utilities director commensurate with water usage.
No nonhousehold unit shall be charged the on-site sewage disposal fee in this section if such nonhousehold unit is connected to the Spokane County sewage system whose effluent is treated by a regional sewage treatment facility, the city of Spokane sewage system, Liberty Lake Sewer District sewage system or the city of Millwood sewage system.
(Res. 05-1046 § 3, 2005)

11.17.040  Use of moneys generated from APA fees.
The moneys generated from the APA fees imposed pursuant to Section 11.17.030 of this chapter, shall be used for the following purposes:
(1)   The preparation of a comprehensive plan to protect, preserve, and rehabilitate subterranean water, including ground water management programs adopted under Chapter 90.44 RCW. This plan may be prepared as a portion of a county sewerage and/or water general plan pursuant to RCW Section 36.94.030;
(2)   The construction of facilities for: (A) the removal of water-borne pollution, (B) water quality improvement, (C) sanitary sewage collection, disposal, and treatment, (D) stormwater or surface water drainage collection, disposal, and treatment, and (E) the construction of public water systems;
(3)   The proportionate reduction of special assessments imposed by a county, city, town, or special district in the aquifer protection area for any of the facilities described in subsection (2) of this section;
(4)   The costs of monitoring and inspecting on-site sewage disposal systems or community sewage disposal systems for compliance with applicable standards and rules, and for enforcing compliance with these applicable standards and rules in aquifer protection areas created after June 9, 1988; and
(5)   The costs of: (A) monitoring the quality and quantity of subterranean water and analyzing data that is collected, (B) ongoing implementation of the comprehensive plan developed under subsection (1) of this section, (C) enforcing compliance with standards and rules relating to the quality and quantity of subterranean waters, and (D) public education relating to protecting, preserving, and enhancing subterranean waters.
Provided, further, moneys generated from the APA fees imposed pursuant to Section 11.17.030 of this chapter may also be used for those items set forth in Spokane County Resolution Nos. 87-0690 and 87-0989.
The chairman of the board of county commissioners of Spokane County, or a majority of the board, is authorized at other than an open meeting to enter into separate interlocal agreements with cities and towns which are included within the boundaries of the APA. The agreement shall include, among other matters, the proportionate share if any of any APA fees which the city or town shall receive on an annual basis. All fees received by cities or towns can only be spent for those purposes authorized under this section.
(Res. 05-1046 § 4, 2005)

11.17.050  Billing of APA fees.
(a)   Commencing January 1, 2006, the Spokane County treasurer shall be responsible for the billing and collection of APA fees. APA fees shall be displayed and billed on the annual property tax statement for the parcel, and shall be mailed to the name and address shown on the real property tax roll at the time annual property tax bills are prepared. Parcels which are exempt from property taxes and do not receive an annual property tax statement will be billed for the aquifer fee and/or other fees. If a payment less than the sum of the total property tax, plus APA fees or less than the sum of one-half of the property tax, plus one-half of the APA fees are received for a combined property tax and APA fees, and an individual has not otherwise specified, the county treasurer shall first apply the payment to the annual property tax of the parcel pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 84.56 RCW and then apply any remaining amount to the APA fees or other fees.
(b)   The total amount of the APA fees shall be due and payable to the county treasurer on or before the 30th day of April, and shall be delinquent after that date; however, if one-half of such APA fees are paid on or before the 30th day of April, the remainder shall be due and payable on or before the 31st day of October, and shall be delinquent after that date.
(c)   Commencing January 1, 2006, the property tax statement shall designate the amount of any APA fees that are past due. In addition, the property tax statement shall contain the following explanation relating to the APA fees:
AQUIFER. This is a fee, not a tax. The revenues from this charge are used to provide a financing method to preserve, protect and rehabilitate the Spokane-Rathdrum Aquifer as provided for in RCW 36.36. A lien may be imposed for any fee at least eighteen months delinquent per RCW 36.36.045. The lien shall be foreclosed in the same manner as property tax liens RCW 36.94.150.
(Res. 05-1046 § 5, 2005)

11.17.060  Collection of liens.
All liens created for delinquent APA fees pursuant to RCW Section 36.36.045 shall be collected by the county treasurer in accordance with the procedures set forth in RCW Section 36.94.150.
(Res. 05-1046 § 6, 2005)

11.17.070  Contract with Spokane County treasurer.
The chairman of the board of county commissioners of Spokane County, or a majority of the board, is authorized to enter into an agreement at other than an open meeting with the Spokane County treasurer for the billing of APA fees, as provided for in this chapter.
(Res. 05-1046 § 7, 2005)

11.17.080  Effective date.
This chapter shall take effect on January 1, 2006, and shall automatically terminate twenty years thereafter on December 31, 2025.
(Res. 05-1046 § 8, 2005)

11.17.090  Severability.
Any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter should be held invalid or unconstitutional, the validity or constitutionality thereof shall not affect the validity or constitutionality of any other section, sentence, clause or phrase of this chapter.
(Res. 05-1046 § 9, 2005)

Chapter 11.20  CRITICAL AREAS
Sections:
11.20.010  Title, purpose and intent.
11.20.020  Definitions.
11.20.030  General provisions.
11.20.040  Emergency permits, reasonable use exception.
11.20.050  Wetlands.
11.20.060  Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas.
11.20.070  Geologically hazardous areas.
11.20.075  Critical aquifer recharge areas.
11.20.080  Incentives.
11.20.090  Appendices.

11.20.010  Title, purpose and intent.
A.   Title. This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the "Critical Areas Ordinance for the Protection of Wetlands, Fish and Wildlife Habitats, Geo-hazard Areas and Critical Aquifer Recharge Areas."
B.   Purpose. The purpose of this chapter is to implement the overall critical areas goals, and the specific goals and policies for wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat, geo-hazard areas, and critical aquifer recharge areas contained in the county comprehensive plan, Chapter 10 natural environment and Chapter 36.70A RCW, Growth Management Act of the State of Washington. The specific goals for wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat, geo-hazard areas, and critical aquifer recharge areas are listed in each section. Goals for frequently flooded areas are listed in the county comprehensive plan and implemented by the Spokane County Code Chapter 3.20, Flood Damage Protection, also referred to as the "flood ordinance," or as amended. Furthermore, it is expressly the purpose of this chapter to protect the health, safety and welfare of the general public.
C.   General Purpose of this Chapter. In addition to the purpose set forth in Section 11.20.010.B, the following are general purposes of this chapter.
1.   To protect the public health, safety and welfare by preserving, protecting, restoring and managing through the regulation of development and other activities within wetland, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, geologically hazardous areas and critical aquifer recharge areas.
2.   To recognize wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas geologically hazardous areas and critical aquifer recharge areas as important natural resources which provide significant environmental functions and values including: vital importance to critical fish and wildlife habitat, surface and ground water quality, aquifer recharge, flood control, shoreline anchorage and erosion control, scientific research and education, open space, aesthetic values, historic and cultural preservation, passive recreation and contribute to quality of life currently enjoyed by citizens of the county.
3.   To maintain consistency with county, state and federal protective measures, utilizing the best available science to support policies and regulations to protect the functions and values of critical areas.
4.   To avoid duplication and over-regulation by limiting regulatory applicability to those development and activities with significant impacts.
5.   To minimize impacts of regulation on private property rights.
6.   To identify and protect wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, geologically hazardous areas and critical aquifer recharge areas without violating any citizen's constitutional rights.
7.   To alert appraisers, assessors, owners and potential buyer or lessees of property to the development limitation within wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas and geologically hazardous areas.
8.   To prevent degradation of critical aquifer recharge areas.
9.   Strive to achieve no net loss of critical areas functions and values, including fish and wildlife habitat.
D.   Intent.
1.   The intent of these regulations is to avoid or, in appropriate circumstances, to minimize, rectify, reduce, or compensate for impacts arising from land development and other activities affecting wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas, geologically hazardous areas and critical aquifer recharge areas; and to maintain and enhance the biological and physical functions and values of these areas.
2.   When avoiding impacts to wetlands is not reasonable, mitigation shall be implemented to achieve no net loss of wetlands in terms of acreage, function, and value.
3.   It is recognized that land development will not always be compatible with preservation of fish and wildlife and their habitats. Some wildlife will be eliminated as development occurs. It is the intent of these regulations to preserve wildlife when possible through thoughtful planning and consideration of wildlife needs.
4.   It is the intent of these regulations to allow development in geo-hazard areas only when hazards can be mitigated to protect the public health, safety and general welfare.
5.   In addition, the intent of these regulations is to recognize that property rights and public services are an essential component of our legal and economic environment. Where such rights and public services are seriously compromised by the regulations contained in this chapter, impacts may be permitted provided there is appropriate mitigation.
(Ord. No. 8-0609, 6-24-2008; Res. 03-0754, Attachment A (part), 2003; Res. 96-0302 (part), 1996)

11.20.020  Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following definitions shall apply:
For the purposes of definitions related to Fish and Wildlife Habitat and Species Conservation Areas, see Section 11.20.060
Activity or activities: See "regulated activity."
Agricultural activities: Those activities conducted on lands defined in RCW 84.34.020(2), or as amended, which are either (a) lands in any contiguous ownership of twenty or more acres (i) devoted primarily to the production of livestock or agricultural commodities for commercial purposes, or (ii) enrolled in the federal conservation reserve program or its successor administered by the United States Department of Agriculture; (b) any parcel of land five acres or more but less than twenty acres devoted primarily to agricultural uses, which has produced a gross income from agricultural uses equivalent to one hundred dollars or more per acre per year for three of the five calendar years preceding the date of application for classification under this chapter; or (c) any parcel of land of less than five acres devoted primarily to agricultural uses, which has produced a gross income from agricultural uses equivalent to one thousand dollars or more per acre per year for three of the five calendar years preceding the date of application for classification under this chapter. Agricultural lands shall also include farm wood lots of less than twenty and more than five acres and the land on which appurtenances necessary to the production, preparation or sale of the agricultural products exist in conjunction with the lands producing such products.
Agricultural lands shall also include any parcel of land of one to five acres, which is not contiguous, but which otherwise constitutes an integral part of farming operations being conducted on land qualifying under this section as "farm and agricultural lands."
Agricultural activities shall also include those existing and ongoing activities involved in the production of crops or livestock; for example, the operation and maintenance of farm and stock ponds or drainage ditches, operation and maintenance of ditches, irrigation drainage ditches, changes between agricultural activities and normal maintenance, repair, or operation of existing serviceable structures, facilities, or improved areas. Activities which bring an area into agricultural use are not part of an ongoing operation. An operation ceases to be ongoing when the area on which it is conducted is converted to a non-agricultural use or has lain idle for more than five years, unless the idle land is registered in a federal or state soils conservation program, or unless the activity is maintenance of irrigation ditches, laterals, canals, or drainage ditches related to an existing and ongoing agricultural activity. Forest practices are not included in this definition.
Applicant: A person who files an application for permit under this chapter and who is either the owner of the land on which that proposed regulated activity would be located or is the authorized agent of the owner.
Best available science: Current scientific information used in the process to designate, protect, or restore critical areas, which is derived from a valid scientific process as defined by WAC 365-195-900 through 365-195-925. Sources of the best available science are included in Citations of Recommended Sources of Best Available Science for Designating and Protecting Critical Areas, or as amended, published by the Washington State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development.
Biosolids: Municipal sewage sludge that is a primary organic, semi-solid product resulting from the wastewater treatment process, that can be beneficially recycled and meets all applicable requirements under WAC Chapter 173-308. Biosolids includes material derived from biosolids, and septic tank sludge, also known as septage, that can be beneficially recycled and meets all applicable requirements under WAC Chapter 173-308. For the purpose of this rule, semisolid products include biosolids or products derived from biosolids ranging in character from mostly liquid to fully dried solids.
Board: The Board of Spokane County Commissioners.
Buffer area: A designated area along the perimeter of a wetland, fish and wildlife habitat or other critical area which is regulated to minimize impacts of adjacent activities and uses from intruding into the critical area.
Building envelope: An area where regulated activities and uses are confined.
Compensatory mitigation: Replacing project-induced wetland losses or impacts, and includes, but is not limited to, the following:
a.   Restoration: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning natural or historic functions to a former or degraded wetland. For the purpose of tracking net gains in wetland acres, restoration is divided into b and c:
b.   Re-establishment: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of returning natural or historic functions to a former wetland. Re-establishment results in a gain in wetland acres (and functions). Activities could include removing fill material, plugging ditches, or breaking drain tiles.
c.   Rehabilitation: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a site with the goal of repairing natural or historic functions of a degraded wetland. Rehabilitation results in a gain in wetland function but does not result in a gain in wetland acres. Activities could involve breaching a dike to reconnect wetlands to a floodplain or return tidal influence to a wetland.
d.   Creation (establishment): The manipulations of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics present to develop a wetland on an upland or deepwater site where a wetland did not previously exist. Establishment results in a gain in wetland acres. Activities typically involve excavation of upland soils to elevations that will produce a wetland hydroperiod, create hydric soils, and support the growth of hydrophytic plant species.
e.   Enhancement: The manipulation of the physical, chemical, or biological characteristics of a wetland site to heighten, intensify, or improve specific function(s) or to change the growth stage or composition of the vegetation present. Enhancement is undertaken for specified purposes such as water quality improvement, flood water retention, or wildlife habitat. Enhancement results in a change in some wetland functions and can lead to a decline in other wetland functions, but does not result in a gain in wetland acres. Activities typically consist of planting vegetation, controlling non-native or invasive species, modifying site elevations or the proportion of open water to influence hydroperiods, or some combination of these activities.
f.   Protection/maintenance (preservation): Removing a threat to, or preventing the decline of, wetland conditions by an action in or near a wetland. This includes the purchase of land or easements, repairing water control structures or fences, or structural protection such as repairing a barrier island. This term also includes activities commonly associated with the term preservation. Preservation does not result in a gain of wetland acres, may result in a gain in functions, and will be used only in exceptional circumstances.
Critical aquifer recharge areas: Areas where there is an aquifer that is a source of drinking water that is vulnerable to contamination that would affect the potability of the water (WAC 365-190-030).
Critical areas: Areas as defined in the county comprehensive plan.
Critical material (critical material list): A substance present in sufficient quantity that its accidental or intentional release would result in the impairment of one or more of the beneficial uses of aquifer water. Current beneficial uses of aquifer water include, but are not limited to, domestic and industrial water supply, agricultural irrigation, stock watering and fish raising. The critical materials list is set forth in Chapter 3.15, as amended, of the Spokane County Code. The list includes the names of specific chemicals and classes of chemicals which, based on current criteria and standards, are known to affect the beneficial use of water.
Critical materials handbook: A document prepared specifically to assist in the administration of this chapter, containing examples of best management practices, which may be employed to meet the performance standards of this chapter, as associated with critical materials.
Critical materials use activity: An activity or land use which has been determined to use, transport or store a critical material.
Dedication: Conveyance of land to the county or other not-for-profit entity by deed or other instrument of conveyance.
Degraded wetland: A wetland altered through impairment of some physical or chemical property which results in reduction of one or more wetland functions and values.
Density transfer: The process of transferring all or some portion of the amount of development associated with a site to another portion of the site.
Department: The public works department of Spokane County.
Developable area: Land outside of wetlands, wetland buffers or any other restricted area on a particular piece of property.
Development: Any construction or expansion of a building, structure, or use; any change in use of a building or structure or changes in the use of land that require a development permit from the county.
Director: The official of Spokane County designated to carry out the planning functions pursuant to RCW 36.70 and RCW 36.70A or his/her authorized designee.
Documented habitat: Habitat where endangered, threatened, sensitive species or species of local importance have been "documented" or are known to exist as confirmed by state or federal agencies.
Ecosystem: A dynamic and interrelating complex of plant and animal communities and their associated environment.
Emergent wetland: A wetland with at least 30 percent of the surface area covered by erect, rooted, herbaceous wetland vegetation as the uppermost vegetative strata.
Enforcement authority: All divisions of Spokane County public works, as applicable.
Enhancement: See "Compensatory mitigation."
Erosion: The wearing away of the ground surface as a result of mass wasting or the movement of wind, water, soil and/or ice.
Exotic: Any species of plants or animals which are foreign to the planning area.
Extraordinary hardship: The strict application of the provisions of this chapter and/or rules adopted to implement this chapter would prevent all reasonable use of the property.
Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas: Areas defined in WAC-365-190-080(5), or as amended. Fish and wildlife habitat conservation means land management for maintaining species in suitable habitats within their natural geographic distribution so that isolated subpopulations are not created. This does not mean maintaining all individuals of all species at all times, but it does mean cooperative and coordinated land use planning is critically important among counties and cities in a region.
Fish and wildlife habitat conservation areas include:
a.   Areas with which primarily endangered, threatened and candidate species have a primary association and;
b.   Habitats and species of local importance;
c.   Naturally occurring ponds under twenty acres and their submerged aquatic beds that provide fish or wildlife habitat;
d.   Waters of the state;
e.   Lakes, ponds, streams, and rivers planted with game fish by a governmental or tribal entity; or
f.   State natural area preserves and natural resources conservation areas;
g.   Wildlife corridors and landscape linkages;
h.   Candidate and monitored species;
i.   Priority habitats and areas in which priority species have a primary association as identified by the department of wildlife (WDFW) in the priority habitat and species lists; priority habitats as identified by WDFW, are areas with one or more of the following attributes: comparatively high wildlife density, high wildlife species richness, significant wildlife seasonal ranges, wildlife travel corridors, limited availability and/or highly vulnerable habitat. Priority habitats in Spokane County include wetlands, riparian areas, urban natural open space, shrub steppe, moose habitat, elk habitat, white tail deer winter range, cavity nesting duck habitat, water fowl habitat, cliff/bluff, old growth and mature forest, and aspen stands.
Forested wetland: A wetland area with at least thirty percent of the surface area covered by woody vegetation greater than twenty feet in height and at least one quarter acre in size or comprise at least ten percent of the total area of the wetland.
Forest practice: Any activity conducted on or directly pertaining to forestland relating to growing, harvesting, or processing timber, including but not limited to:
a.   Road and trail constructions;
b.   Harvesting, final and intermediate;
c.   Pre-commercial thinning;
d.   Reforestation;
e.   Fertilization;
f.   Prevention and suppression of diseases and insects;
g.   Salvage of trees; and
h.   Brush control.
i.   Forest practice shall not include preparatory work such as tree marking, surveying and road flagging, and removal or harvesting or incidental vegetation from forest lands such as berries, ferns, greenery, mistletoe, herbs, mushrooms, and other products which cannot normally be expected to result in damage to forest soils, timber, or public resources (RCW 76.09.020(8)).
Forest Practice Class 4: As defined by the Forest Practice Act WAC 222-16-030, or as amended.
Functions "beneficial functions," or "functions and values": The beneficial roles served by wetlands including, but not limited to, water quality protection and enhancement, fish and wildlife habitat, food chain support, flood storage, conveyance and attenuation, groundwater recharge and discharge, erosion control, wave attenuation, historical and archaeological and aesthetic value protection, and recreation. These beneficial roles are not listed in order of priority.
Geologically hazardous areas: Areas that, because of their susceptibility to erosion, sliding, earthquake, or other geological events, are not suited to siting commercial, residential, or industrial development consistent with public health or safety concerns.
Grading: Excavation or fill or any combination thereof, including, but not limited to, the establishment of a grade following the demolition of a structure or preparation of a site for construction or development.
Hearing body: The individual, committee, or agency designated by the board of county commissioners to conduct public hearings and render decisions on subdivisions, amendments, special permits, conditional uses, appeals and other matters as set forth in the Spokane County zoning code.
High quality vegetative buffer: A wetland buffer comprised of multi-level dense native vegetation including shrubs.
Hydric soil: Soil that is saturated, flooded or ponded long enough during the growing season to develop anaerobic conditions in the upper part. The presence of hydric soil shall be determined following the methods described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (1997), or as amended, and the Corp of Engineers Arid West Interim Regional Supplement (2007), or as amended.
Hydrophytic vegetation: Macrophytic plant life growing in water or on a substrate that is at least periodically deficient in oxygen as a result of excessive water content. The presence of hydrophytic vegetation shall be determined following the methods described in the Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (1997), or as amended, and the Corp of Engineers Arid West Interim Regional Supplement (2007), or as amended.
In-kind mitigation: The restoration or replacement of a wetland with hydrogeomorphic characteristics closely approximating those of a specified wetland.
Isolated wetlands: Those wetlands which:
a.   Are outside of and not contiguous to any one hundred-year floodplain of a lake, river, or stream; and
b.   Have no contiguous hydric soil or hydrophytic vegetation between the wetland and any surface water.
Landscape linkage: A movement corridor in which the complete range of community and ecosystem processes continue to operate through time. Plants and small animals are able to move between larger landscapes over a period of generations.
Maintenance: See definition of "repair or maintenance."
Mitigation: The use of any or all of the following actions listed in descending order of preference:
a.   Avoiding the impact altogether by not taking a certain action or parts of an action;
b.   Minimizing impacts by limiting the degree or magnitude of the action and its implementation, by using appropriate technology, or by taking affirmative steps to avoid or reduce impacts;
c.   Rectifying the impact by repairing, rehabilitating or restoring the affected environment;
d.   Reducing or eliminating the impact over time by preservation and maintenance operations during the life of the action;
e.   Compensating for the impact by replacing, enhancing, or providing substitute resources or environments; or
f.   Monitoring the impact and the compensation project and taking appropriate corrective measures. Mitigation may include a combination of the above measures.
Monitoring: A periodic evaluation of a wetlands restoration, creation or enhancement site to determine changes at the site, such as vegetation growth, hydrologic changes, and soil development, use of the site by birds and animals.
Native vegetation: Vegetation on a site or plant species which are indigenous to the area in question; or if the site has been cleared, species of a size and type that were on the site or reasonably could have been expected to have been found on the site at the time it was cleared.
Non-conforming development: A use or structure which was lawfully constructed or established prior to the effective date of this chapter or amendments thereto, but which does not conform to present regulations or standards contained in this chapter.
Noxious weeds: Those plants which are non-native, highly destructive and competitive as defined by RCW 17.10, or as amended.
Off-site mitigation: Restoration or replacement of a wetland within its primary drainage basin, but not adjacent to the site on which a wetland has been or will be degraded. Locations within the county will be given preference over those outside the county.
On-site mitigation: Restoration or replacement of wetland at or very near the site where a wetland has been or will be degraded by a regulated activity.
Open water component: Wetlands having any areas of standing water present for more than one month at any time of the year without emergent, scrub-shrub, or forested vegetation. Open water includes any aquatic beds.
Ordinary high water mark: That mark on streams, lakes or water bodies that will be found by examining the bed and banks and ascertaining where the presence and action of waters are so common and usual, and so long continued in normal years, as to mark on the soil a character distinct from that of the abutting upland in respect to vegetation.
Out-of-kind mitigation: The restoration or creation of a wetland with hydrogeomorphic characteristics not resembling those of a specified wetland.
Owner: Any person having title to, a substantial beneficial proprietary interest in, or control of a building or property, including but not limited to a lessee, guardian, receiver or trustee, and the owner's duly authorized agent.
Person: A natural person, his/her heirs, executors, administrators or assignees, or a firm, partnership or corporation and its or their successors and assignees, or a governmental entity.
Person aggrieved: A corporation, company, association, society, firm, partnership or joint stock company, as well as an individual, a state, and all political subdivisions of a state or any agency or instrumentality thereof, not in agreement with a decision made by the department or hearing body.
Placeholder: An area designated by the Washington State Department of Health to hold the place of a wellhead protection area for a well until completion of the wellhead protection plan.
Pollution: Such contamination, or other alteration of the physical, chemical or biological properties of wetlands, or such discharge of any liquid, gaseous, solid, radioactive or other substance into wetlands as will or is likely to cause a nuisance or render such wetlands harmful, detrimental or injurious to the public health, safety or welfare, or to domestic, commercial, industrial, agricultural, recreational or other legitimate beneficial uses, or to livestock, wildlife, fish, native vegetation or other aquatic life.
Practical alternative: An alternative that is available and capable of being carried out after taking into consideration cost, existing technology, and logistics in light of overall project purposes, and having fewer impacts to wetlands. It may involve using an alternative site in the general region that is available to the applicant and may feasibly be used to accomplish the project.
Primary drainage basin: The basin of the stream or tributary within which a project is proposed, not including basins of major tributaries. For the purpose of this regulation: the primary drainage basin of Latah Creek is not a part of the primary drainage basin of the Spokane River; the primary drainage basin of Marshall Creek is not a part of the primary drainage basin of Latah Creek.
Priority habitats and species: A fish or wildlife habitat or species that has been identified by the Washington State Department of Fish and Wildlife in the priority habitat and species program or by Spokane County as a species of local importance.
Publicly owned treatment works (POTW): A treatment works treating domestic sewage that is owned by a municipality, a county, the state of Washington, or the federal government.
Qualified biologist: The holder of a four-year degree in biology with an emphasis in fish and wildlife biology from an accredited university and at least two years field experience evaluating land use impacts on fish and wildlife species and their habitats.
Qualified erosion or landslide specialist: An individual or team that has both the academic qualifications and field experience to implement the provisions of this chapter.
Qualified geologist: A Washington State licensed geologist or hydro-geologist, or a geologist from another state with a license recognized by the state of Washington.
Qualified professional: For the purposes of water typing, means a person with a Bachelor of Science degree in forestry, wildlife, ecology, or a related field and trained in the state of Washington water typing system as provided by Washington State Department of Natural Resources.
Qualified wetland specialist: A holder of a Society of Wetland Scientists (SWS) certification or has the equivalent in academic qualifications and field experience for making competent wetland delineation's, reports, and recommendations necessary to implement the provisions of this chapter.
Regulated activity: Any of the activities which are directly undertaken or originate in a critical area or its buffer as provided for in Sections 11.20.030, 11.20.050, and 11.20.075 of this chapter.
Repair or maintenance: Repair means to restore a development to its original condition within a reasonable period after decay or partial destruction except where repair involves total replacement which is not common practice or causes substantial adverse effects to the resource or environment; maintenance means those usual acts to prevent a decline, lapse or cessation from a lawfully established condition. Repair and maintenance also includes vegetation management or repair of structures used to provide electricity, natural gas, and/or other utility services to the public in existing utility rights-of-way.
Residential development: Only single-family, two-family, multifamily, manufactured and mobile home, community residential facility, community treatment facility, dormitory, fraternity and sorority, as defined in the Spokane County zoning code, or as amended.
Restoration: See "compensatory mitigation."
Riparian: Riparian areas are transitional between terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems and are distinguished by gradients in biophysical conditions, ecological processes, and biota. They are areas through which surface and subsurface hydrology connect water bodies with their adjacent uplands. They include those portions of terrestrial ecosystems that significantly influence exchanges of energy and matter with aquatic ecosystems (i.e. a zone of influence). Riparian areas are adjacent to perennial, intermittent, and ephemeral streams, lakes, and estuarine-marine shorelines.
Scrub-shrub wetland: An area of vegetated wetland with at least thirty (30) percent of its surface area covered by woody vegetation less than twenty (20) feet in height as the uppermost strata.
Serviceable: Presently usable.
Site: Any lot or parcel of land or contiguous combination thereof, where activities are proposed, performed or permitted.
Subject property: The site where an activity requiring a permit or approval under this chapter will occur.
Unavoidable and necessary impacts: Impacts to wetlands that remain after an applicant for a wetland permit has demonstrated that no practicable alternative exists for the proposed project.
Urban growth area (UGA): Areas within which urban growth shall be encouraged and outside of which growth can occur only if it is not urban in nature as defined in RCW 36.70A.110.
Utilities: Enterprises or facilities serving the public by means of an integrated system of collection, transmission, distribution, and processing facilities through more or less permanent physical connections between the plant of the serving entity and the premises of the customer. Included are systems for the delivery of natural gas, electricity, telecommunications services, and water, and for the disposal of sewage.
Vegetative classes: Certain types of wetland plant vegetation as defined by the Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Eastern Washington (2004), or as amended, and must be at least one-quarter acre in size or comprise at least ten percent of the entire wetland.
Vernal wetland system: Seasonal depressional wetlands typically occurring high in the drainage that derive their hydrology from rainfall and snow and a small immediate watershed. Vernal systems are formed as a result of accumulation of surface water in an isolated basin that at no time of the year would have a natural inlet or outlet and water is entirely absent from the surface part of the year.
Water dependent: A use which cannot exist in any other location and is dependent on the water by reason of the intrinsic nature of its operations; such as, but not limited to, bridges, marinas, dams for domestic/industrial water supply, flood control, and/or hydroelectric production; water diversion structures and facilities for water supply, irrigation and/or fisheries enhancement; flood water and drainage pumping plants and facilities; hydroelectric generating facilities and appurtenant structures; structural and nonstructural flood damage reduction facilities, and stream bank stabilization structures and practices.
Water types: Water typing system established by WAC 222-16-031 or as amended and implemented by Washington State Department of Natural Resources for classifying streams, lakes and ponds as type S water (shorelines of the state), type F water (fish), type Np water (nonfish perennial), Ns (Nonfish seasonal) see Section 11.20.060.C.1.h.
Wetland or wetlands: Consistent with RCW 36.70A.030(21), "wetland" or "wetlands" means areas that are inundated or saturated by surface water or ground water at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas. Wetlands do not include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, and landscape amenities, or those wetlands created after July 1, 1990, that were unintentionally created as a result of the construction of a road, street, or highway. Wetlands may include those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland areas created to mitigate conversion of wetlands.
Wetland banking: Involves the off-site created, restoration, and/or enhancement of wetlands to compensate for unavoidable wetlands impacts associated with development. The newly created or restored site functions as a 'bank' which can issue credits to compensate for future wetland impacts.
Wetland buffer or wetland buffer area: An area that surrounds and protects a wetland from adverse impacts to the functions and values of a wetland. The buffer width shall be determined according to the rating assigned to the wetland in accordance with Section 11.20.050 of this chapter. Buffer width is measured outward from the wetland boundary.
Wetlands delineation manual: The Washington State Wetlands Identification and Delineation Manual (1997), or as amended, the Corp of Engineers Arid West Interim Regional Supplement (2007), or as amended, or any other wetlands delineation adopted or recommended for use by the Washington State Department of Ecology.
Wetlands exempt from regulation: Those artificial wetlands intentionally created from non-wetland sites, including, but not limited to, irrigation and drainage ditches, grass-lined swales, canals, detention facilities, wastewater treatment facilities, farm ponds, landscape amenities (RCW 36.70A.030), and wetlands created by existing and ongoing mining operations.
Wetlands of local significance: Wetlands evaluated for a higher category utilizing the Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Eastern Washington (2004), or as amended.
Wetlands permits: Any permit, modification, revision or variance issued, conditioned or denied pursuant this chapter.
Wetland types: Categories of wetlands based on specific attributes such as rarity, sensitivity to disturbance, and functions and consistent with the rating system described in the Washington State Wetlands Rating System for Eastern Washington (2004) or as amended.
Wildlife corridor: A landscape feature that facilitates the biologically effective transport of animals between larger patches of habitat dedicated to conservation functions. Such corridors may facilitate several kinds of traffic, including frequent foraging movements, seasonal migrations, or the once-in- a-lifetime dispersion of juvenile animals. These are transitional habitats and need not contain all the habitat elements required for the long-term survival or reproduction of its migrants.
(Ord. No. 8-0609, 6-24-2008; Res. 03-0754, Attachment A (part), 2003; Res. 97-0652 Attachment A (part), 1997; Res. 96-0302 (part), 1996)

11.20.030  General provisions.
A.   Applicability. This chapter shall apply to all unincorporated areas of the county. No action shall be undertaken by any person that impacts critical aquifer recharge areas or results in any alteration of a wetland, fish and wildlife habitat or geologically hazardous area and their buffer areas as defined in this chapter, except in conformance with this chapter. Uses and activities listed in Table 11.20.030A are allowed in wetlands, fish and wildlife habitat areas, geologically hazardous areas and their buffer areas only if: (1) The use or activity is in compliance with the requirements of this chapter and (2) The use or activity is in compliance with all other applicable provisions of the Spokane County Code. Uses and activities listed in critical aquifer recharge areas (CARA) Section 11.20.075 Table 11.20.075B shall conform with requirements in this chapter. In addition, other uses and activities not listed shall not violate the intent of this chapter.
TABLE INSET:

  Table 11.20.030A
Allowable Uses and Activities Within Wetlands, Fish and Wildlife Habitats and Geo-Hazard Areas
   
Uses & Activities
Permitted Without
County Review
   
Wetlands & Buffers   Fish and Wildlife Habitats   Geo-Hazard Areas   
Passive recreation, scientific research   P   P   P   
Agriculture - Existing, on-going   P   P   P   
Agriculture ditch, maintenance   P   P   P   
Floating docks, boat mooring, buoys   P   P   P   
Conservation activities   P   P   P   
Harvesting of wild crops   P   P   P   
Noxious weed control   P   P   P   
Open space, natural area   P   P   P   
Road repair & maintenance   P   P   P   
Signs (interpretive markers)   P   P   P   
*Utilities repair maintenance   P   P   P   
*Diseased vegetation removal, vegetation removal within 30' of existing structure   P   P   P   
Water well pump house, wildlife blind, nesting structure   P   P   P   
Single family residence and accessory structures and decks   L   L   L   
Septic drain field for single family residence   L   P   L   
Single family private access road/driveway   L   L   L